【精选】《文化遗产保护保护的历史与理论问题》第五部分 修复与反修复《文化遗产保护保护的历史与理论问题》第五部分 修复与反修复.pdf

Historical and Philosophical Issues in the Conservation of Cultural Heritage Edited by Nicholas Stanley Price M. Kirby Talley Jr. Alessandra Melucco Vaccaro Los Angeles ：the Getty Conservation Institue ，1996 同济大学建筑系 陆地（粗译） 仅供内部学习参考，请勿转载。欢迎大家踊跃校对 O( ∩_ ∩)O ，请把校对意见发邮件到 tjludi@ 。 PART Ⅴ Restoration and Anti-Restoration 第五部分 修复与反修复 INTRODUCTION TO PART Ⅴ 308 第五部分的引言  READING 阅读材料 30 Eugène-Emmanuel Viollet-le-Duc | Restoration 尤金-艾玛纽尔 维欧勒-勒-杜克《论修复》  31 William Morris | Manifesto of the Society for the Protection of Ancient Buildings 威廉•莫里 斯《古建筑保护协会宣言》  32 John Ruskin | The Lamp of Memory Ⅱ 约翰•拉斯金  《记忆之灯（二）》    P308 Introduction to Part Ⅴ Restoration and Anti-Restoration Translated by Alexandra Trone  第 4 部分 修复与反修复 The nineteenth century is a complex period from which many current trends in conservation are directly descended. All the readings in Part V, which often start from the same premises, stress the essential dichotomy that runs through the century. This applies not only to the relationship between Classicism and Romanticism, but also within the Romantic Movement itself, in which opposing sensibilities and standpoints confront one another above and beyond the predilection for the medieval and reassessment of the Gothic. 十九世纪是一个复杂的时期，许多现今的保护趋向直接发源于此。第五部分的所有文 章，通常有着相同的前提，都强调贯穿整个世纪的基本的二元对立。这不仅适用于古典主义 和浪漫主义之间的关系，而且也适用于浪漫主义运动本身。对立的情感和立场相互对峙，超 越了对中世纪的偏好和对哥特风格的重新评价。 The ethics of restoration also exemplify and reflect this conflict, which is particularly severe in the field of architecture. One need only think of Eugene-Emmanuel Viollet-le-Duc on the one hand, and William Morris and John Ruskin on the other. 修复伦理也体现和反映了这种冲突，在建筑领域尤其剧烈。你只需想想维奥莱-勒-迪克， 再想想威廉•莫里斯和约翰•拉斯金（的理论）就知道了。 Viollet-le-Duc is considered to be the greatest exponent of the movement whose adherents thought of restoration as imitation and as reconstruction