CT与磁共振技术在股骨头坏死诊断中的应用价值比较分析.docVIP

CT与磁共振技术在股骨头坏死诊断中的应用价值比较分析 唐海涛 江苏农垦肿瘤医院 X 关注成功！ 加关注后您将方便地在 我的关注中得到本文献的被引频次变化的通知！ 新浪微博 腾讯微博 人人网 开心网 豆瓣网 网易微博 摘????要： 目的:探讨CT与磁共振技术在股骨头坏死诊断中的应用价值并作出比较分析。方法:选取股骨头坏死30例患者为研究对象, 通过盲选平均分方法将30例股骨头坏死患者均分两组, 并分别进行CT检查或者磁共振检查。结果:CT组与磁共振组的检出率:CT组的检出率53.33% (8/15) 明显低于磁共振组的检出率86.67% (13/15) , P0.05;CT组与磁共振组的ARCO分级准确率:两组的ARCO分级Ⅰ期与Ⅱ期无明显差异, P0.05;而CT组的ARCO分级Ⅲ期及Ⅳ期则明显低于磁共振组, 有明显差异, P0.05。结论:股骨头坏死患者应用磁共振检测仪进行检查诊断比通过CT扫描检测仪进行检查诊断检出率更高, 值得推广及应用。 关键词： CT; 磁共振技术; 股骨头坏死; 应用价值; 收稿日期：2017-07-26 Analyzed the Application Value of CT and Magnetic Resonance in Diagnosis of Femoral Head Necrosis TANG Hai-tao Jiangsu Agricultural Reclamation Tumor Hospital; Abstract： Objective: To evaluate the value of CT and magnetic resonance in the diagnosis of femoral head necrosis. Methods: 30 patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head were selected as the research objects. 30 patients with osteonecrosis of the femoral head were divided into two groups by means of blind selection, and CT examinations or magnetic resonance imaging examinations were performed respectively. Results: The detection rate of CT group and magnetic resonance group: the detection rate of CT group was 53.33% (8/15) , which was significantly lower than that of magnetic resonance group 86.67% (13/15) , P0.05; the ARCO classification accuracy of CT and MRI group, two groups of ARCO stage classification Ⅰ and Ⅱ is no significant difference, P 0.05; and CT group ARCO stage classification Ⅲ and Ⅳ is significantly lower than the magnetic resonance, there are significant differences, P 0.05. Conclusion: The detection rate is higher than the CT scan, which is worth promoting and applying. Keyword： CT; Magnetic Resonance Technology; Femoral Head Necrosis; Application Value; Received： 2017-07-26 股骨头坏死是临床常见的骨科疾病, 及早诊断股骨头坏死, 可以有利于临床及早给予对照组, 以提高治疗效果, 改善预后, 改善生活质量。本次研究为探讨CT与磁共振技术在股骨头坏死诊断中的应用价值并作出比较分析。现将本次研究结果详细报道如下。 1 资料与方法 1.1 一般资料 选取自2015年11月到2017年06月期间收治的股骨头坏死30例患者为研究对象, 通过盲选平均分方法将30例股骨头坏死患者均分两组, 通过CT扫描检测仪进行检查诊断的15例患者为CT组, 通