欧洲风能技术论文94_Demand_Response–A_New_Option_for_Wind_Integration.pptVIP

Demand Response for Wind Integration Fraunhofer ISI, March 2006 Demand Response – A New Option for Wind Integration ? Marian Klobasa, Dr. Mario RagwitzFraunhofer Institute for Systems and Innovation Research European Wind Energy Conference 2006 Athens, 2. March 2006 Outline Motivation for Demand Response Potentials for Demand Response Simulation of Wind Energy, Electricity System and Demand Impacts of Wind Fluctuation on Electricity Systems Benefits of Demand Response? Improving of system reliability Peak load and balancing power can be reduced Efficient electricity use by increased transparency Reduction of price peaks and lower price volatility Increase of short term price elasticity and improvement of market-clearing Better market functioning Reduced risks for market actors Use of demand response as an existing resource might need lower investments than new generation capacity Studies gave evidence of substantial economical and technical potentials Demand response increases the possibilities for wind integration when balance between supply and demand is tightening Increased Elasticity can reduce Electricity Prices Realistic Option? Experiences from Scandinavia and Germany 24 Jan 2000 (Price peaks up to 400 €/MWh) Demand response in Sweden 200-1000 MW, in Norway 800-1100 MW 5 Feb 2001 (Price peaks 240 €/MWh, 9 hours over 100 €/MWh) DR in Sweden up to 700 MW, in Norway up to 500 MW Winter 2002/03 (December-price level 90 €/MWh) Nordel: DR in Norway 800 MW, in Sweden 200 MW ECON: DR in Norway 1000 MW DR in Germany (2005): 200 MW contracted by SaarEnergie for minute reserve market Outline Motivation for Demand Response Potentials for Demand Response Simulation of Wind Energy, Electricity System and Demand Impacts of Wind Fluctuation on Electricity Systems Potential for demand response Example steel production: electric arc furnace Typical batch process Tap to tap time: 45 minutes Power Supply: 100 MW Capacity: 200 tons Yea