Essential Academic Vocabulary - SFUca - Simon Fraser University必要的学术词汇sfuca -西蒙·弗雷泽大学.doc

Essential Academic Vocabulary - SFUca - Simon Fraser University必要的学术词汇sfuca -西蒙·弗雷泽大学.doc

  1. 1、本文档共4页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Essential Academic Vocabulary - SFUca - Simon Fraser University必要的学术词汇sfuca -西蒙·弗雷泽大学

Essential Academic Vocabulary by Helen Huntley Houghton Mifflin Company 2006 Colleges and universities are teeming with vocabulary books these days, as is this newsletter with their reviews. Like Schmitt and Schmitt’s Focus on Vocabulary reviewed previously Helen Huntley’s Essential Academic Vocabulary utilizes Averil Coxhead’s Academic Word List as a basis for a wide range of vocabulary activities. Geared both for native speakers and ESLs (though the weblinks, perhaps tellingly, contain “esl” in their urls), Essential Academic Vocabulary uses research on vocabulary cited in Schmitt and Schmitt’s “Vocabulary Notebooks: Theoretical Underpinnings and Practical Suggestions” (1995). This research comes from a variety of sources and perhaps because of this, seems at times to be going into opposite directions, e.g. a recommendation that students use word pairs to increase learning efficiency seems to go against the advice that “the best way to remember new words is to incorporate them into language that is already known” (Schmitt Schmitt, as cited in Huntley, 2006, p.). Also somewhat controversial is the information that “The deeper the mental processing used when learning a word, the more likely that a student will remember it.” (Schmitt Schmitt, as cited in Huntley, 2006, p. vii). Concerns related to this point are summarized in Hulstijn and Laufer (2001) who propose the involvement load hypothesis as an alternative; they found that exercises which require learners to retrieve vocabulary in writing compositions resulted in greater retention of words learned than either simply reading or doing a gapfill exercise. This is because writing requires greater involvement—a combination of need, search, and evaluation of suitable vocabulary. Folse (2006) goes a step further, having determined that repeated exposure is a stronger factor than involvement load in promoting retention of words learned. Huntley has taken great care to cover her theoretical bases with a wide ra

文档评论(0)

153****9595 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档