secret wealth vs.for richer,for poorer文章译文.docVIP

secret wealth vs.for richer,for poorer文章译文 Secret wealth vs. for richer, for poorer When Linda, a social worker in the New York area, received a significant chunk of money after her mother died, she did not divulge the amount to her husband of 15 years. Instead, she set up separate accounts earmarked for the education of their son and daughter. Worried that her marriage would founder once her children left home, Madame M., the wife of an Asian industrialist, bought an expensive apartment in central Paris to prepare as a possible escape hatch. The money she used had been inherited from her father. The marriage survived. But a decade later, her husband and children still dont know about the Paris property. Such behavior is perfectly legal. But the people who engage in it are reluctant to use their full names for fear of destabilizing their families. The classic marriage vows may urge for richer, for poorer, but concealing financial activities from a spouse is hardly a new strategy. Over a century ago in his play A Dolls House, Henrik Ibsen used the device of a wifes secret loan to unveil the dynamics of an unhealthy marriage. But in an age when divorce and serial marriage have become commonplace, when many women are entering marriages earning large sums and such assets are an increasing component of family wealth, it is not just billionaires like Ronald Perelman, president of Revlon, and Donald Trump who are concerned about protecting what is his, what is hers and what is theirs. While prenuptial agreements and even postnuptial agreements are increasingly being used to set boundaries, in the end, who gets what depends on legal jurisdiction, sound financial planning, national traditions and the psychological state of the marriage. Common sense may dictate that since most countries require income tax returns signed by both spouses, husbands and wives should at least know what the other is earning. But this is not necessarily so, experts in marriage counseling and