- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
And Ultimately…The Window of Opportunity Is there evidence of change in Policies, Programs, Strategies, or Resource allocation? Need for Benchmarks Coalition building Policy Learning Agenda Setting “best” “worst” Initial Assessment Coalition building Agenda Setting Policy Learning Post-Intervention Assessment Coalition Building: No change Agenda Setting: Improved Policy Learning: Improved Window open In Summary Policy change is a complex, dynamic process. Research can play a key role but the research-to-policy gap must be bridged. Agenda-setting, coalition building policy learning are key elements in policy change. Effective policy communication depends on clear findings, implications recommendations. Saving Women’s Lives Communicating your research findings to policymakers will help open the Window of Opportunity for improved maternal health policies. Thank you! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * By Nancy Yinger, The Population Reference Bureau AMDD Conference Kuala Lumpur, 2003 Workshop Objectives Goal: To provide overview of the role of information in policy process. ? Topics: ?The research-to-policy gap A model of the policy process ?Policy-relevant findings, implications, and recommendations The importance of evaluation The Research-to-Policy Gap Large investments have been made in policy-relevant data collection and research. Yet, opportunities for increasing knowledge and putting data to use are often lost. Researchers and decision makers work in different spheres. How is the gap manifested? Stereotypes Assumptions about how decisions are made Researchers Stereotypes of Policymakers Uninterested or too busy to read Reach hasty conclusions Actions unsubstantiated by data Distrust survey and research findings Limited perspective Should be responsible for drawing implications from the data Policymakers’ Stereotypes of Researchers Avoid policy implications of findings Prone to professional faddism Excessive use
您可能关注的文档
- 历史:2012届高考复习:22两次工业革命课件新人教版必修2章节.ppt
- AML中国诊疗指南-AML部分-V2章节.ppt
- 历史:2012届高考复习:22罗马法的起源与发展课件新人教版.ppt
- 历史:2012届高考复习:32古代中国的文学书画和戏曲艺术课.ppt
- amp;160;变态与健康心理学1章节.ppt
- AndroidvsiOSvsWindowsPhone7章节.pptx
- 历史:2012届高考复习:32中国近现代社会生活的变迁课件新.ppt
- ANSYS简介2章节.ppt
- C2C电子商务1章节.ppt
- 历史:2012届高考复习:41近代中国的思想解放潮流课件新人.ppt
- Creo10机械设计教程高职高专教材詹友刚第02章节二维草绘02章节.ppt
- Creo10机械设计教程高职高专教材詹友刚第03章节零件设计02章节.ppt
- Creo10机械设计教程高职高专教材詹友刚第04章节装配设计02章节.ppt
- Creo10机械设计教程高职高专教材詹友刚第05章节工程图的创建02章节.ppt
- Creo10机械设计教程高职高专教材詹友刚第06章节曲面设计02章节.ppt
- CRM项目启动会安排模版.ppt
- CRM应用的基本功能模块和设计原理-第十三讲1章节.ppt
- D_Max_V-Ray材质.ppt
- d_max_VR测试与出图参数解析.ppt
- d_max1工作环境与基本操作.ppt
文档评论(0)