MAXQDA2018内部编码一致性检验(官方说明的中英文粗对照).docVIP

MAXQDA2018内部编码一致性检验 （官方说明的中英文粗对照） 说明：时间关系，没有进行精翻译，只是简单中文翻译器粗翻译后，进行对照呈现。但也基本上能理解其中的内容了，若有不明白的，可以按照后注邮件联系我，互帮互助！ 23 - Teamwork 23 - 团队合作 23.1 How can MAXQDA support Teamwork? 23.2 Transferring a MAXQDA Project to Other Team Members 23.3 Transferring Coded Segments, Memos, Variables, etc. from one Project to another 23.4 Merging Two MAXQDA Projects 23.5 Intercoder Agreement 23.6 User Access Management 23.1 MAXQDA如何支持团队协作？ 23.2将MAXQDA项目转移给其他个成员 23.3将编码分段，备忘录，变量等从一个项目转移到另一个项目 23.4合并两个MAXQDA项目 23.5内部编码一致性 23.6用户访问管理 23.5 Intercoder Agreement When assigning codes to qualitative data, it is recommended that certain criteria be set. You assume, for example, that coding is not arbitrary or random, but rather that a certain level of reliability will be reached. The MAXQDA “Intercoder agreement” function makes it possible to compare two people coding the same document independently of each other. In qualitative research, the purpose of comparing independent coders is to discuss the differences, figure out why they occurred, and learn from the differences in order to improve coding agreement in the future. In other words, the actual percentage of agreement is not the most important aspect of the tool. This percentage is, however, provided by MAXQDA. It is always the goal of qualitative analysts to achieve as high a level of agreement as possible between independent coders. It is not, however, focused on getting to a standard coefficient that is statistically necessary as in quantitative research. Rather, the focus is on a practical improvement of the coding quality. For this reason, one doesn’t focus on the coefficient or percentage of agreement. Instead, qualitative researchers want to address and edit the coded segments that do not agree, so that they can move on with more accurately coded material. The Intercoder Agreement tool is set up to compare and contrast a single document coded by two independent coders, highlighting the areas where the two researchers’ coded segmen