酶联免疫法与化学发光免疫法检测AFP的比较.docVIP

精品论文 参考文献 酶联免疫法与化学发光免疫法检测AFP的比较 黄海深 陈志通 唐光定 江伟河（广东省阳山县人民医院检验科 513100） 【中图分类号】R446.6 【文献标识码】A【文章编号】1672-5085（2013）08-0125-02 【摘要】 目的 对甲胎蛋白(AFP)试验进行方法学探讨。方法　①对比实验 用酶联免疫法和化学发光免疫法同时测定88例临床送检血清标本甲胎蛋白(AFP)的含量。②线性实验　将标准液按不同的浓度稀释后做线性实验。③精密度实验　用两法对低、中、高值质控品分别进行精密度实验。结果　①结果表明，两法无显著差异(P＞0.05)，相关系数r＝0.995，提示两法呈良好相关性。②线性实验显示酶联免疫法和化学发光免疫法分别在5～400 ng/ml和2～900 ng/ml范围内呈良好的线性关系。③精密度实验表明化学发光重复性好于酶联免疫法,特别是病理高值化学发光明显优于酶联免疫法。结论　化学发光免疫法的精密度和准确性均优于酶联免疫法。 【关键词】 酶联免疫法　化学发光免疫法　甲胎蛋白 比较 【Abstract】 Object: The methodology investigate of Alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) test. Methods: ①Comparative experiments: The simultaneous determination of the serum samples of 88 patients censorship alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels by ELISA and chemiluminescent immunoassay. ②Linear experiments: the standard solution is diluted at different concentrations,then doing linear experiments.③Precision experiments: Doing precision experiments on low, medium and high-value quality control materials with the two methods. Results: ①The results show that no significant difference in the two methods(P＞0.05). The correlation coefficient of r = 0.995, these two methods showed a good correlation. ②The linear experiments show that the enzyme linked immunosorbent assay and chemiluminescence immunoassay showed a good linear relationship between the range in 5～400ng/ml and 2～900ng/ml.③Precision experiments show that the repeatability of chemiluminescent immunoassay is better than the enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, specifically at the pathological high value. Conclusion: The precision and accuracy of the chemiluminescent immunoassay are better than enzyme linked immunosorbent assay. 【Key words】 ELISA Chemiluminescent immunoassay Alpha-fetoprotein Comparison 甲胎蛋白（AFP）是哺乳动物胚胎期肝脏卵黄囊合成的一种糖蛋白，是辅助诊断原发性肝癌最常用的检测指标。临床上检测AFP的方法主要有放射免疫法(RIA)、酶免疫法(EIA)、酶联免疫法(ELISA)、荧光免疫法(FIA)、化学发光分析法(ECLIA)等，而近年发展起来的化学发光免疫法因其快速、精确、重现性好及试剂安全无毒的特点，显示出很好的应用前景［1］。酶联免疫法定性检测AFP以其快速、简便、实效的优势在各级医院应用较广。这两种方法临床常用，为进一步了解化学发光免疫法的特点，本文报告用酶联免疫法和化学发光免疫