- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
4种不同方法预防乳磨牙龋病的效果观察
4种不同方法预防乳磨牙龋病的效果观察
[摘要]目的 探?4种方法预防乳磨牙龋病的临床效果。方法 选取2015年1~6月本辖区(深圳市宝安区)160例3~5岁幼儿为研究对象,根据防龋方法的不同分为四组,每组40例,A组采用含氟牙膏刷牙,B组为含氟牙膏刷牙+涂氟保护漆,C组为含氟牙膏刷牙+流体树脂窝沟封闭,D组为含氟牙膏刷牙+流体树脂窝沟封闭+涂氟保护漆。分别对四组幼儿干预后6、12、18个月患龋情况进行观察。结果 A组干预后6、12、18个月的乳磨牙龋患率分别为5.00%、15.00%、40.00%,B组干预后12个月龋病发生率为5.00%,干预后18个月为25.00%,C组干预后12个月龋病发生率为10.00%,干预后18个月为25.00%,D组干预后18个月龋病发生率为10.00%,干预后18个月A组龋病发生率显著高于B组、C组、D组,D组龋病发生率最低,差异有统计学意义(P
[关键词]氟保护漆;窝沟封闭术;乳磨牙;龋病
[中图分类号] R781.1 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2017)03(b)-0116-04
[Abstract]Objective To investigate the clinical effect of 4 different methods for preventing dental caries in deciduous molars.Methods 160 cases of children aged 3-5 years in this district (Baoan District of Shenzhen City) from January to June in 2015 were selected as the research objects and divided into four groups with 40 cases in each group according to the different preventing decay methods.Children in group A used fluoride toothpaste to brush their teeth,children in group B used fluoride toothpaste to brush their teeth and their teeth were coated with fluoride protection paint,children in group C used fluoride toothpaste to brush their teeth and their teeth were coated with liquid resin pit and fissure sealant,children in group D used fluoride toothpaste to brush their teeth and their teeth were coated with fluoride protection paint and liquid resin pit and fissure sealant.The caries status of children in 4 groups 6,12,18 months after intervention were observed.Results In group A,the caries prevalence rates of primary molars was respectively 5.00%,15.00% and 40.00% when 6,12,18 months after intervention,which was 5.00%,25.00% 12,18 months after intervention in group B,with 10.00% 12 months and 25.00% 18 months after intervention in group C,and with 10.00% 18 months after intervention in group D.The incidence of dental caries in group A 18 months after intervention was significantly higher than that of group B,group C or group D,the incidence of dental caries in group D was the l
文档评论(0)