澳洲标准 AS4100.ppt

Finite Element Model of Crusher Base Design Soil Stiffness 600 MPa applied as springs using Barken approach. First Natural Frequency (8.68 Hz) and Mode Shape for the Crusher Base Design and 600 MPa SoilRocking about long axis Crusher Force phase relationships considered for New and Worn liner configurations 1. In – phase 2. Staggered - phase to 900 3. Staggered - phase to 1800 4. Out of phase 1800 5. Out of phase 1800 Max. Displacements (um peak) for Various crusher phase configurations Phase Relationship Max. Displacement X Direction (um peak) New Liners Max. Displacement X Direction (um peak) Worn Liners 1 55 57 2 51 58 3 35 67 4 30 70 5 - 27 Phase Relationship Max. Displacement Y Direction (um peak) New Liners Max. Displacement Y Direction (um peak) Worn Liners 1 99 122 2 88 115 3 62 92 4 59 90 5 - 14 Predicted Vibration Response Y (um peak) for 600 MPa Soil and Crusher Forces In-Phase (New and Worn Liners) 50um peak Between 50um and 100um peak 100um peak New Liners Worn Liners Max. 122 μm Pk Max. 99 μm Pk Predicted Vibration Response Y (um peak) for 600 MPa Soil and Crusher Forces Phase Relationship #2 (New and Worn Liners) 50um peak Between 50um and 100um peak 100um peak New Liners Worn Liners Max. 115 μm Pk Max. 88 μm Pk Comments Peak predicted displacement of 122 um is above the criteria of 100 um. Recommended action to reduce vibration response is to widen the base of the raft. Lengthening the raft may also prove beneficial although will likely be less effective. Vibration Analysis General Overview AS 4100 mentions vibration analysis to the extent that it should be considered as part of the design of structures where vibration maybe a problem. AS 4100 refers to AS 2670 and human comfort/exposure levels. It does not and there is no generally accepted Australian standard for the design and acceptance of vibration in structures or machines. The closest and most relevant standard that EDC is aware of is DIN 4150-3. Vibration Analysis – Frequency Do