Part Nine现代金融业务.ppt

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
Part Nine现代金融业务

Part Nine Fundamental Insurance I. Principles and Contracts II. Types of Insurance III. Insurance Market IV. Insurance Business I. Principles and Contracts 1.Principles Principle of Indemnity It is one of the most important rule for any types of insurance, particularly for property insurance. According to this principle, the insured may not collect more than the actual loss in the event of damage caused by an insured peril. This principle serves to control moral hazards that might otherwise exist. B. Principle of Insurable Interest A fundamental legal principle that strongly supports the principle of indemnity is that of insurable interest, which holds that an insured must demonstrate a personal loss or else be unable to collect amount due when a loss caused by an insured peril occurs. If the insured could collect without having an insurable interest, a moral hazard would exist. If you own a property, you have the insurable interest; If you lease a property, you have the insurable interest; If you steal a property, you have no insurable interest. C. Principle of Subrogation This principle grows out of the principle of indemnity. Under it one who has indemnified another’s loss is entitled to recover from any liable third parties. Thus, if X negligently causes damage to Y’s property, Y’s insurance Co. will indemnify Y to the extent of its liability for Y’s loss and then has the right to proceed against X for any amount it has paid out under Y’s policy. One of the important reasons for subrogation is to reinforce the principle of indemnity. That is , to prevent the insured from collecting more than the actual amount of the loss. If Y’s insurer didn’t have the right of subrogation, it would be responsible for Y to recover from the policy and then recover again in a legal action against X. In this way Y would collect twice. It would also be possible for Y to arrange an accident with X collect twice and split th

文档评论(0)

yaocen + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档