对弗鲁姆-耶顿模型的介绍.pdf

Acad，回ryofMar啕阳市时胁帽w 1979,VoI. 4， 他). 2 ,249-257. A Critique of the Vroom-Yetton Contingency Model ~ Of Leadership Behavior1 R. H. GEORGE FIELD Unive陌ity of Toronto Thl~ Vroom-Yetton contingency model of1I坦dersh加behaViωr is described am:J critiqued. While there is some evidence for the validity of the mode/, ths use of concurrent validation with self-report data serious/y questions thi:~ validity. The model is of limited utility because it deals with on伊 one aspect of leader behavior and is not as parsimonious as alternative mod- els. The Vroom-Yetton ∞ntingency model of leader- pends on subjective aspects 01 the decision (the ship behavior (21) is 01 im阴阳n饵 to managers leelings 01 people) (9). because it was developed as a m创el 01 how lead- Decision processes that may be used range Irom ers should make dec: isions il they are to be e何ec­ autocratic (AI , AII) , to consultive (CI , CII) , to group tive. Ifvalid ,the modE!1 ∞uld be used as a tool to aid process (GII). Subordinate participation in the de- in the selection of appropriate decision-making cision-making process increases in the order of AI , processes for differE!nt situations , resulting in in- AII , CI , CII , GI I. When using process AI the mana- creased decision ancl organizational effectiveness. ger solves the problem alone, using inlormation The full Vroom-Yetton contingency model deals available at that time , while with