- 1、本文档共59页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
FEDERAL COURTS OUTLINE - NYU School of Law联邦法院轮廓的纽约大学法学院
FEDERAL COURTS OUTLINE
I. INTRODUCTION
Legal Process School = Hart Wechsler’s methodology. Asks who does and ought to make legal decisions taking into account three factors:
Federalism = What is the role of federal courts in the states?
Separation of powers = What is the relationship of the federal courts to the executive and legislative branches?
Institutional competence = Which institution is best equipped to make decisions?
Allocational approach = Legal process scholars focus on the soundness of process in constitutional decision-making. Theories of democracy and majoritarianism underlie this approach.
Criticisms = Several other schools of thought began to emerge and challenge the premises on which legal process thinking rested.
Neutrality undesirable = With a focus on process, legal process scholars were of the view that all legal thinking should be neutral. Scholars began to criticize this “insidious desire to remain unimpassioned…”
Brown v. Board of Education = Legal process thinking never came to terms with the Court’s decision in Brown, which challenged each of the three legal process factors:
Court would not defer to state sovereignty.
Court weakened the distinction between the federal and state systems.
Court would help those who weren’t being protected by the political process.
Fundamentalist approach = Decision-making today looks nothing like legal process thinking. The Court looks to the text of the Constitution, policy, and tradition to make an argument about the best interpretation of the Constitution.
Other approaches = Alternative approaches replace process with substantive theories, efficiency, and anti-subordination principles:
Law economics
Critical legal studies
Nonetheless, the Hart Wechsler approach still has some power in federal courts, especially the Supreme Court.
History of the Federal Courts
Articles of Confederation = There was no independent federal judiciary. Congress itself had adjudicative authority. But everyone recogni
您可能关注的文档
- AIDS抗病毒治疗的依从性.ppt
- AKTApilotIQOqpq验证方案.doc
- Allocation of Support Department Costs, Common Costs, and 支持部门成本,分配共同成本,和.ppt
- Appendix A Master Security Requirements Traceability Matrix:附录一主安全需求跟踪矩阵.doc
- ASME第九卷焊接和钎焊评定标准.ppt
- Associative Fear Learning Enhances Sparse Network Coding in 联想的恐惧学习提高了编码的稀疏网络.ppt
- ASSET VALUATION DEBT INVESTMENTS ANALYSIS AND VALUATION--CFA真题及解答 ASSET VALUATION DEBT INVESTMENTS ANALYSIS AND VALUATION.doc
- Australian Government Administrative Law Guide:澳大利亚政府行政的法律指南.doc
- A县建筑工程质量安全监督站工程质量安全监督表单汇总.doc
- A公司招聘方案的设计与研究x.docx
- 2024-2025学年小学信息技术(信息科技)四年级上册(2020)闽教版(2020)教学设计合集.docx
- 2025年食品行业追溯体系与食品安全风险管理研究报告.docx
- 2024-2025学年小学信息技术(信息科技)四年级上册电子工业版(内蒙古)教学设计合集.docx
- 水厂项目可行性分析报告(仅供参考).docx
- 2025年物流智能化设备租赁市场政策影响与市场前景分析.docx
- 2025年沿海地区海洋经济高质量发展与城乡融合发展报告.docx
- 机械装备制造业智能化升级关键技术与市场潜力研究报告.docx
- 2025年合规科技在跨境业务合规管理中的战略布局报告.docx
- 2025年工业互联网平台云化架构优化在数据隐私保护领域的成本效益分析报告.docx
- 2024-2025学年小学信息技术(信息科技)四年级上册人教版教学设计合集.docx
文档评论(0)