网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

FEDERAL COURTS OUTLINE - NYU School of Law联邦法院轮廓的纽约大学法学院.doc

FEDERAL COURTS OUTLINE - NYU School of Law联邦法院轮廓的纽约大学法学院.doc

  1. 1、本文档共59页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
FEDERAL COURTS OUTLINE - NYU School of Law联邦法院轮廓的纽约大学法学院

FEDERAL COURTS OUTLINE I. INTRODUCTION Legal Process School = Hart Wechsler’s methodology. Asks who does and ought to make legal decisions taking into account three factors: Federalism = What is the role of federal courts in the states? Separation of powers = What is the relationship of the federal courts to the executive and legislative branches? Institutional competence = Which institution is best equipped to make decisions? Allocational approach = Legal process scholars focus on the soundness of process in constitutional decision-making. Theories of democracy and majoritarianism underlie this approach. Criticisms = Several other schools of thought began to emerge and challenge the premises on which legal process thinking rested. Neutrality undesirable = With a focus on process, legal process scholars were of the view that all legal thinking should be neutral. Scholars began to criticize this “insidious desire to remain unimpassioned…” Brown v. Board of Education = Legal process thinking never came to terms with the Court’s decision in Brown, which challenged each of the three legal process factors: Court would not defer to state sovereignty. Court weakened the distinction between the federal and state systems. Court would help those who weren’t being protected by the political process. Fundamentalist approach = Decision-making today looks nothing like legal process thinking. The Court looks to the text of the Constitution, policy, and tradition to make an argument about the best interpretation of the Constitution. Other approaches = Alternative approaches replace process with substantive theories, efficiency, and anti-subordination principles: Law economics Critical legal studies Nonetheless, the Hart Wechsler approach still has some power in federal courts, especially the Supreme Court. History of the Federal Courts Articles of Confederation = There was no independent federal judiciary. Congress itself had adjudicative authority. But everyone recogni

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

shenlan118 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档