靖安油田Q1区空气泡沫驱用起泡剂的 优选与应用.pdfVIP

Journal of Oil and Gas Technology 石油天然气学报, 2018, 40(1), 53-59 Published Online February 2018 in Hans. /journal/jogt /10.12677/jogt.2018.401008 The Optimization and Application of Foaming Agent for Air Foam Flooding in Q1 Area of Jing’an Oilfield 1 1 1 1 1 2* Wenlai Zhang , Weihua Wang , Tianli Rao , Yongfu Long , Yu Zhang , Huan Yang 1 No.3 Oil Production Plant of Changqing Oilfield Company, PetroChina, Yinchuan Ningxia 2 School of Chemistry Environmental Engineering, Yangtze University, Jingzhou Hubei th th th Received: Jul. 30 , 2017; accepted: Sep. 7 , 2017; published: Feb. 15 , 2018 Abstract Q1 Area of Jing’an Oilfield was located in the oil and gas folded and enriched belt of Northern Shaanxi in Ordos Basin of Western China, which was a low permeability, low pressure, low abun- dance (three low properties) lithologic reservoir. The AES foaming system was mixed with the AES foaming agent and foam stabilizer PAM independently; it was difficult for operation and poor flowing at low temperature, so the new CSGY-FPJ foam system was chosen for Q1 Area. The results showed that the CSGY-FPJ foaming agent was better than that of AES foaming agent in the foaming properties, surface tension, and low-temperature rheological properties. The physical model ex- periment indicated that as the air foam flooding injection volume was 1.0 PV, the recovery rate of CSGY-FPJ foam system and AES foam system was 37.5% and 32% respectively; after water flooding the recovery increased by 5.9%. In November, 2015, field tests were carried out in A4 and A5 In-