社会调查 选题教学文稿.pptVIP

社会调查的一般程序 1.选题阶段 2.准备阶段 3.调查阶段 4.分析阶段 5.总结阶段 第三章 选题及其具体化 一、调查课题的类型 1.理论性与应用性 服务于政府：决策参考 服务于企事业单位：管理参考 服务于社会：社会生活及个人行为准则依据 服务于科学的理论：理论的佐证 2.自选与委派 研究者自行选定的课题 相关部门委托指派的课题 基金性质的课题 二、选题的重要性 提出问题比解决问题更重要，因为解决问题也许仅仅是一个数学上或实验上的技术而已，而提出新问题、新的可能性、从新的角度去看旧的问题，都需要有创造性的想象力，而且标志着科学的真正进步。 ——爱因斯坦 1.决定方向： 说明调查目的、范围、对象 具体、明确、有针对性 2.体现水平 3.制约过程 4.影响质量 三、选题的原则 1.重要性 理论价值 实践意义 医疗卫生体制改革中的利益协调问题研究 农村基本医疗卫生保障制度改革与建设研究 近代公共卫生意识的变迁研究 近代食品安全制度研究 巩固和发展新型农村合作医疗制度研究 医疗损害赔偿调解研究 2.创造性：新、特 原始创新 模仿创新 方法与技术创新 应用创新 思路或技术路线创新 In contrast to the vast interpersonal trust literature [8–10], inquiry into the nature of trust at the health system level is a relatively recent phenomenon [5,11]. The health-related trust literature gives particular attention to the central role of trust inpatient–provider and provider–state agency relationships [8,14,16,17]. Shifts in citizen–state relations have also garnered attention as the era of paternalistic professional–patient relations has been replaced by the current mode of entrepreneurial customer centered relations. Indeed, consumerism and an erosion of the public service ethos driven by entrepreneurial values in the public sector is widely believed to have undermined the trust in professionalism that underpinned the relation-ship between the public, health professions and the state. 3.可行性——可能性 研究者因素： 学术相关 有机组合 高中低结合 队伍规模适中 力量不过强过弱 外在条件因素： 4.合适性——最佳性 相关领域有相应研究成果 具备这方面的知识技能 The impact of the introduction of market incentives on occupational health services and occupational health professionals: Experiences from The Netherlands Factors associated with enrollment, satisfaction, and sustainability of the New Cooperative Medical Scheme program in six study areas in rural Beijing Has cost containment after the National Health Insurance system been successful ? Determinants of Taiwan hospital costs The relationship between quality management systems and organizational performance in the Italian National Health Service Cost of illness: