- 1、本文档共8页,可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
工业设计_外文翻译-1_精品
Design Without Designers
网站截图:
/baidu?word=%B9%A4%D2%B5%C9%E8%BC%C6%D3%A2%CE%C4%CE%C4%CF%D7tn=sogouie_1_dg
原文:
Design Without Designers
I will always remember my first introduction to the power of good product design. I was newly arrived at Apple, still learning the ways of business, when I was visited by a member of Apples Industrial Design team. He showed me a foam mockup of a proposed product. Wow, I said, I want one! What is it?
That experience brought home the power of design: I was excited and enthusiastic even before I knew what it was. This type of visceral wow response requires creative designers. It is subjective, personal. Uh oh, this is not what engineers like to hear. If you cant put a number to it, its not important. As a result, there is a trend to eliminate designers. Who needs them when we can simply test our way to success? The excitement of powerful, captivating design is defined as irrelevant. Worse, the nature of design is in danger.
Dont believe me? Consider Google. In a well-publicized move, a senior designer at Google recently quit, stating that Google had no interest in or understanding of design. Google, it seems, relies primarily upon test results, not human skill or judgment. Want to know whether a design is effective? Try it out. Google can quickly submit samples to millions of people in well-controlled trials, pitting one design against another, selecting the winner based upon number of clicks, or sales, or whatever objective measure they wish. Which color of blue is best? Test. Item placement? Test. Web page layout? Test.
This procedure is hardly unique to Google. A has long followed this practice. Years ago I was proudly informed that they no longer have debates about which design is best: they simply test them and use the data to decide. And this, of course, is the approach used by the human-centered iterative design approach: prototype, test, revise.
Is this the future of design? Certainly there are many who believe so. This is a
您可能关注的文档
- 企业管理:万科地产人力资源手册_精品.doc
- 幕墙拆除施工方案_精品.doc
- 工程测量实习报告范文3000字_精品.doc
- 工程机械液压传动系统故障诊断与维修_精品.doc
- 对儒家道德教育的历史批判及其现代性意蕴_精品.doc
- 关于农村集体土地流转问题的法律思考_精品.doc
- 国有企业重组,改制的申请及方案审批操作规范_精品.doc
- 凤庆县人民医院手术分级管理授权审批表_精品.doc
- 农村小学生英语口语能力的培养(Development of oral English ability for rural primary school students)_精品.doc
- 全国农牧渔业丰收奖奖励办法_精品.doc
- 2021-2022学年湖南省常德市安乡县四年级上学期期中语文真题及答案.pdf
- 2023-2024学年河南省南阳市社旗县四年级上学期期中数学真题及答案.pdf
- 2022-2023学年云南省曲靖市四年级下学期期末数学真题及答案.pdf
- 2021-2022学年河南省周口市鹿邑县二年级下册月考语文真题及答案.pdf
- 2018年河南焦作解放区教师招聘考试真题及答案.pdf
- 2019年江西公务员行测考试真题及答案-乡镇.pdf
- 2019中国石油报社应届高校毕业生招聘试题及答案解析.pdf
- 光大银行招聘应届毕业生能力素质测试笔试真题及答案.pdf
- 2024年广西百色教师招聘考试模拟题及答案.pdf
- 2021-2022学年浙江绍兴诸暨市五年级上册语文期末试卷及答案.pdf
文档评论(0)