福建日报报业集团主办51.ppt

Common Measures Overview Overview Common Measures: Where did They Come From? What are the Key Dimensions and Benefits? Data Elements and Definitions Example Scenarios Technical Assistance Inquiries Where did it come from? In 2001, the President’s Management Agenda announced an aggressive strategy to improve the overall management and performance of the Federal Government. As part of the initiative, programs with similar goals were to apply a consistent (common) set of measures in order to measure and report their performance. Key Dimensions During the last program year, the transition year, the application of Common Measures to HVRP and VWIP was a work in progress. In PY2007, Common Measures reporting was formally instituted. Requires a partnership and on-going dialogue between VETS Staff and the Competitive Grantees, primarily communicated through the Common Measures Quarterly Technical Goals Sheet and the Common Measures Quarterly Technical Performance Report (Both available on the VETS webpage) . It has been the intent of the agency to accommodate this new Common Measures performance methodology. While retaining key measures (namely the placement rate) that are still appropriate measures for HVRP and VWIP. Without allowing the new measures to adversely impact the delivery of services by these programs. Common Measure Benefits Establishing consistent methodology across federal programs allows VETS to highlight our comparable success which hopefully will lead to increased funding in future years. Maintaining Common Measures and certain key measures (Placement Rate) allows us continue to analyze trend data and to compare future results against current performance. New Common Measure reporting requirements place stronger emphasis on longer retention which should increase overall follow up activities and retention results and thus add additional creditability to our claims of long-term program success. HVRP and VWIP Grantee Requiremen