原创力文档论文：基于专家系统的人工智能与法律使用规则 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAW USING RULE BASED EXPERT SYSTEMS精选.doc
- 1、本文档共147页，可阅读全部内容。
- 2、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。
- 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
论文：基于专家系统的人工智能与法律使用规则 ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAW USING RULE BASED EXPERT SYSTEMS精选
ARTIFICIAL INTELLIGENCE AND LAW USING RULE BASED EXPERT SYSTEMS
Eric Engle
formal symbolic logic and argumentation theory - have been developing separately, in reciprocal incomprehension if not in open clash.
Scholars... have privileged the search for correctness, controllability, and certainty, and have therefor stressed the lack of rigour and the indeterminacy of theories of argumentation. ...
The theorists of argumentation have instead emphasized the conflict of opinions, the evaluation of alternatives... They have therefore condemned symbolic logic for its incapacity to capture these fundamental aspects of moral and legal reasoning.
...
The tension between logic and argumentation must instead be overcome by extending formal methods outside the domain of deduction, to the moments of dialectical conlict... which characterise legal and moral reasoning.
Giovanni Sartor, A Formal Model of Legal Argumentation, p 1. TABLE OF CONTENTS
I. Introduction 6
A. Artificial intelligence in legal teaching and practice 6
B. Limits of the theme 7
C. Interest of AI in law 8
D. Research Objectives 10
E. Method and Problématique 11
F. Problem to be Solved: 13
G. Definitions 16
H. Outline 27
I. Existing Solutions 29
J. Existing Literature 30
II. Extra-Legal Theories of Justification 37
A. The problem of justification 37
B. Contemporary Theories of Justification 38
C. Law and Economics 42
D. Formalism 43
E. Realism 44
F. Aristotle and Justification 46
1. Aristotle - Phronesis (Practical Reasoning: Prudence) 46
2. Aristotle - Virtue and Vice 52
III. An Extra-Legal Theory of Judgment 62
A. How Do Judges Think? 62
B. How Should Judges Think? Great Legal Minds 65
C. Hard Cases and Easy Cases 66
D. Four Cases to Illustrate Best and Worst Case Legal Interpretative Scenarios 69
1. Filartiga v. Pena Irala: 69
2. Bigio v. Coca Cola 71
3. Sampson v. Federal Republic of Germany 73
4. Byung Wha An et al. v. Doo-Hwan Chun, et. al. 74
E. Interpolating multiple graphs to infer a general
文档评论（0）