论刑事诉讼中的法官认证——以认知心理学为视角-on judge authentication in criminal proceedings - from the perspective of cognitive psychology.docxVIP

下载本文档

8
0
约3.47万字
约 39页
2018-05-28 发布于上海
举报
版权申诉

论刑事诉讼中的法官认证——以认知心理学为视角-on judge authentication in criminal proceedings - from the perspective of cognitive psychology.docx

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

论刑事诉讼中的法官认证——以认知心理学为视角-on judge authentication in criminal proceedings - from the perspective of cognitive psychology

AbstractCriminal procedural law don’t stipulate on judge certification specifically，in the reality, when the judge who take the most of responsibility to carry out certification in accordance with the law and legal values , the interests of justice criteria ,the judgeshould choose, judge，decide.Actually，people always do research on this topic Froma legal point of view，but the author think about the problem from the perspective of cognitive psychology based onLaw basis .This essay ,with about 30000words,falls into four parts.The first part is an over- view of the judge certification status and significance of the research are described, starting from the three aspects of substantive justice procedural fairness and litigation efficiency value ,to analyze of the significance of the judge certified. Distinguish between awareness and understanding of different concepts, the definition of a clear understanding, combined with Chinas Law certification status quo analysis of the significance of the value of the use of Cognitive Psychology judge certification. The second part is the analysis of the certification process, the first phase is the overall certification in accordance with the judge certified the first stage is the identification of evidentiary material, the third part described the second phase is the finds evidence of force, respectively,combined with knowledge of cognitive psychology specific analysis. Cognitive psychology and social cognitive psychology realize that human information processing capacity is limited, precisely because of this, people will take shortcuts to information processing, reduce costs, time and mental effort, which is effective, may be because it is a shortcut, but also because of the uncertainties and the limited time situation, leading to error and bias. persons rationality is limited, and only limited attention to the limited knowledge and limited computing power, precisely because of this, easy to subjective considerations into de