- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
生物反馈技术在脑卒中偏瘫患者社区康复中应用分析
生物反馈技术在脑卒中偏瘫患者社区康复中应用分析
[摘要] 目的 探究社区康复中生物反馈技术对脑卒中偏瘫患者的应用及治疗效果。 方法 对本院2010年6月~2011年6月收治的57例脑卒中偏瘫患者随机分为两组,其中对照组28例,使用常规药物治疗;实验组29例,在常规药物治疗的基础上,进行生物反馈技术治疗,运动功能采用简式Fugl-Meyer评估表(FMA)评定;日常生活活动能力采用功能评定量表Barthel指数评定,比较两组患者病程对评分的影响以及疗效。 结果 实验组在FMA评分的改善率为56.56%,显著高于对照组的26.32%;在Barthel指数的改善率为54.31%,也显著高于对照组的21.61%;实验组的总有效率为82.76%,明显高于对照组的57.14%,以上指标两组间比较,结果均具有统计学意义,P均 < 0.05。 结论 生物反馈技术具有较好的疗效,且对运动功能和日常活动能力具有更好的改善能力,值得在临床中推广。
[关键词] 生物反馈技术;脑卒中;偏瘫;康复
[中图分类号] R743.3 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-4721(2012)02(a)-0049-02
Application analysis of biofeedback techniques in hemiparetic patients with stroke in community rehabilitation
CHEN Xiaofeng WANG Yulong ZHANG Qiu WANG Yuzhen
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, the Second Peoples Hospital of Shenzhen City in Guangdong Province, Shenzhen 518000, China
[Abstract] Objective To explore the application and treatment effective for stroke patients with community-based rehabilitation in biofeedback. Methods Fifty seven cases stroke hemiplegia patients from June 2010 to June 2011 treated in our hospital were randomly divided into two groups, the control group had 28 cases who were used of conventional drug therapy; the experimental group of 29 patients in drug treatment based on conventional, motor function were assessed with straightforward Fugl-Meyer Assessment evaluation sheet, and activities of daily life abilities were assessed with Barthel index of function rating scale, the biofeedback treatment of two groups were compared on the score of course and efficacy. Results FMA score in the experimental group improved on the rate of 56.56% was significantly higher than the 26.32% in control group; improvement in the Barthel Index was 54.31%, also significantly higher than the control group with 21.61%; the total effective rate of the experimental group was 82.76%, it was significantly higher than the total effective rate 57.14% in control group, all of the above indexes were compared, and the results were statistically
文档评论(0)