On Tourism and Hospitality Management Research:在旅游和酒店管理研究.doc

On Tourism and Hospitality Management Research:在旅游和酒店管理研究.doc

  1. 1、本文档共31页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
On Tourism and Hospitality Management Research:在旅游和酒店管理研究

Triangulation in Economic Research: Reorienting Economics into Social Science Dr Paul Downward Dr Andrew Mearman Loughborough University University of the West of England Leicestershire Coldharbour Lane LE11 3TU Bristol BS16 1QY Email p.downward@lboro.ac.uk Email Andrew.Mearman@uwe.ac.uk ‘…the modern (forced) separation of the discipline of economics from other social sciences must be recognized as quite misguided. Indeed, this separation merely makes it difficult for economics to advance in pace with other branches of social science….’ (Lawson 2003, p162) 1. Introduction Political Economy in general has long been critical of mainstream economics. Yet, of late, the literature has tended to express this critique not so much with respect to specific theoretical or empirical claims per se, though these are clearly important, but in terms of the methodological apparatus of economics. Amongst many contributions Hodgson (1988) argues that mainstream economics simply emphasises one method of analysis which expresses theoretical explanation in terms of the achievement of an agents objective under effectively full information. This is elaborated upon by highlighting positions of attained equilibrium. As such ‘economics forgot history’ (Hodgson, 2001). Lawson (1997, 2003) from a critical realist perspective has criticised the deductivism of the mainstream; whilst Dow (1990, 1996) its monist tradition, and Davidson (1996) it reliance on the ergodic axiom. In many respects each of the above critiques highlights economics in terms of either/or dualities within the domain of economics and compares the mainstream view of economics with respect to an alternative, specific view of economics, for example, described as a School of Thought (Mair and Miller, 1992). In contrast the work of Tony Lawson is rooted in a more abstract agenda. His book Economics and Reality (1997) provided a critique of economics as social theory, through its critical emphasis upon mainstream method.

文档评论(0)

almm118 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档