创造对事不管理对人的管理氛围（Create a management climate of not doing things, not managing people.）.docVIP

创造对事不管理对人的管理氛围（Create a management climate of not doing things, not managing people.） A manager asked me, an employee has one thing wrong, but he is a key employee of the company. What if I say he, he cant stand it? But what if I dont say him, and he always makes the same mistakes? How can I solve this dilemma? At a senior enterprise meeting, a manager asked me: I handed over to a key employee, a very important thing, he did not finish on time.. But I know hes very hard, and he does a lot of other things while doing it, and he doesnt cooperate well enough. Its not entirely his fault. But I do not say that he himself also uncomfortable, after all, did not give him a good job. What should I do? Is he criticizing him or not criticizing him? In my observation, many managers have chosen to be good old man under such circumstances, that is, no matter what, they do not criticize subordinates, so as to avoid misunderstanding and anger of subordinates, and even choose to leave the company. When managers do so, things usually develop as follows: the wrong subordinates dont know where they are wrong, or they dont like the mistake, and still go their own way. Other employees see in the eyes, remember in mind: as long as I have worked for the company, you can repeatedly have. And the manager is complaining about the fact that things havent been dealt with properly, and his complaint about this person is getting bigger. Finally, one day will vent their resentment on this person or some irrelevant people and things, but will have greater and more bad influence on the management of the company. At this point, the good old man went to the other extreme that he did not want to see: it was that the staff felt as if they were cruel and unreasonable. Ruthless is often the other side of the old man. For example, my advice is that managers should create as much management environment as possible to make things separate from human feelings: people are human beings, things are things.. In s