国内外知名篮球鞋力学性能实验研究.docVIP

国内外知名篮球鞋力学性能实验研究 　　摘 要: 目的:了解国内外二款知名篮球鞋“耐克”全掌气垫篮球鞋和“安踏” 非气垫篮球 鞋的力学性能,评价力学功效。方法:以实验法测试二款知名篮球鞋的力学性能。结果:二 款知名篮球鞋的压力测试表明,几乎所有的被试者“鞋-地”界面平均压力与峰值压力“安 踏”鞋比“耐克”鞋稍高,但二款篮球鞋“鞋-地”界面的平均压力与峰值压力值都不存在 显著性差异(?P?0.05);纵跳实验表明,“安踏”鞋纵跳高度稍高于“耐克”鞋,二 者之 间并无统计学上的差异;摩擦系数实验表明,“耐克”鞋的动静摩擦系数优于“安踏”鞋的 动静摩擦系数,二者的的动静摩擦系数之间存在统计学上的差异(?P? 　　关键词:知名篮球鞋;耐克全掌气垫篮球鞋;安踏非气垫篮球鞋;力学性能 　　中图分类号:G804.61文献标识码:A文章编 号:1007-3612(2010)05-0059-03 　　An Experimental Study on Mechanical Properties of Well-known Bas ketball Shoes at Home and Abroad 　　QIU Qin?er?1,LU Yi?chen?2,LI Jian?she?3 　　(1.Department of Physical Education, Ningbo University, Ningb o 315211, Zhejiang China;?2.Zhejiang Wanli University, Ningbo 315100, Zh ejiang China;? 3.Zhejiang College of Sports, Hangzhou 311123, Zhejiang C hina) 　　Abstract: The purpose of this study was to explore mechanical properties and eva luate mechanical effect of the well?known foreign full?palm?air basketball sh oes of the Nike and domestic non?air basketball shoes of Anta. The method 　　is to conduct experiment on the mechanical properties of these shoes. The stres s tests show that, almost all mean pressure and peak pressure of Anta was slight ly higher than Nike on “shoes?groundindicators, but the average pressure an d peak pressure value does not exist significant differences(?P?0.05). Thevertical jump tests show that the height of vertical jump of Anta was slightly 　　higher than the Nike but without significant difference. The friction coefficie nt tests show that dynamic or static friction coefficient of Nike is superior th an Anta, and the dynamic or static friction coefficient does exist significant d ifferences(?P? 　　2.1.2 实验结果分析 　　足底压力测量技术(measuring technique of plantar pressure)是运用压力测量仪器 对人体在静态或者动态过程中足底压力的力学、几何学以及时间参数值进行测定,对不同状 态下的足底压力参数进行分析研究,揭示不同的足底压力分布特征以及功能评定。 　　图2 “鞋-地”界面作用力3D图运动鞋是人体下肢末端(足)对地面施加作用力的介质,“鞋-地”是介质对地面作用 的界面。平均压力是足底或者鞋底在运动过程中受到垂直方向力的平均值,峰值压力反映人 体运动中足部受到外力的最大冲击,因此这是足鞋相关研究的重要测量指标。“鞋-地”界 面的峰值压力值是纵跳过程中Kistler三维测力台测得的鞋底对测力台压力的最大值,如图2