Instrumentation, Modeling and建模和仪表.pdfVIP

Instrumentation, Modeling and Monitoring of a Concrete Bridge from Construction through Service Erin Santini Bell, Ph.D., P.E. Department of Civil Engineering University of New Hampshire W141 Kingsbury Hall Durham, NH 03824 Phone: (603) 862-3850 Email: erin.bell@ Jesse D. Sipple Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Tufts University 308 Anderson Hall Medford, MA 02155 Email: jesse.sipple@tuf Paul J. Lefebvre Department of Civil Engineering University of New Hampshire W141 Kingsbury Hall Durham, NH 03824 Email: pjl@ John E. Phelps Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Tufts University 308 Anderson Hall Medford, MA 02155 Email: john.phelps@ Brian Brenner, P.E. Vice President Fay, Spofford Thorndike, INC 5 Burlington Wood Burlington, MA Email: bbrenner@ Masoud Sanayei, Ph.D. Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Tufts University 308 Anderson Hall Medford, MA 02155 Email: masoud.sanayei@ November 15, 2009 Word count: 4,916 words (18 figures, 4 tables) Adjusted word count: including figures and tables: 5,265 with footnotes endnotes: 5,810 Santini-Bell et al - TRB 2010 1 of 16 Abstract Instrumentation, structural modeling, monitoring and nondestructive testing are significant components to a comprehensive structural health monitoring program. Another key component of structural health monitoring is a model updating protocol that links the structural model with the collected data for evaluation of both the analytical and measured responses. Recent advancement in sensors technology had increased the popularity of instrumentation however the installation of gauges on an in-service bridge can be costly in terms of manpower and traffic delays. The development of a baselin