- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
Developing a Tool to Measure Health Worker Motivation in District 开发一个工具来测量区卫生工作者积极性
Developing a Tool to Measure Health Worker Motivation in District Hospitals in Kenya Patrick Mbindyo, Duane Blaauw, Lucy Gilson, Mike English Background Interventions to improve worker practice may fail if HWs are poorly motivated Worker motivation strongly linked to worker performance Tool development (SAQ) – to characterize average motivation in hospitals Simple to apply can quantitatively describe hospitals Nested in larger intervention study seeking to improve worker practices in DH Methods To measure motivation, use subjective or objective methods? Literature review done to source possible constructs for inclusion 17 constructs used- 10 determinants; 7 outcomes Result in SAQ with 71 questions: 5 point Likert scale – strongly agree to strongly disagree Response bias - randomly assorted 40% negatively worded Piloted to explore its performance – reduced questions to 66 Outcomes – 23 questions Sampling Data Collection Convenience sample of 90 staff from each hospital (30% of hosp staff) Random sample constraints -staff leave, breaks, shift Total sample size estimate of 720 Data collected by identically trained survey teams on-site (2 weeks per site) Preferentially targeted staff in paediatric areas other areas with regular contact with sick children Intervention was aimed at improving paediatric care. Data Analysis Data analysed using STATA 9.2. Scoring of Likert scale responses: 1-5 (where strongly agree is 5 for positively worded qns). 1-5 (reverse coding for negatively worded qns- strongly disagree is 5) I am confident about my ability to do my job (+ve) I cannot be relied upon by my colleagues at work (-ve) Simple stats used to explore performance of SAQ - frequency distributions, mean and median scores Further analysis done – Correlation (0.5 and above good); Cronbach’s alpha; Factor analysis – data reduction + simplified index Results Respondent Characteristics Hospitals Total (%) X2 P value H1 H2 H3 H4 H5 H6 H7 H8 Gender (female
您可能关注的文档
- 910.数学教学情境理性思考与实践策略.doc
- 912.实现从朴素经验到形式化跨越策略分析.doc
- 929.人教版小学英语教材二度加工策略研究探讨.doc
- 956.浅析发展小学生“隐性”体育能力实践研究.doc
- 957.浅谈职业中学商贸之星“跳蚤市场”创新实践.doc
- 97拳皇出招表电脑键盘.docx
- 9章生产要素价格决定供给.ppt
- 8年级物理上册教案运动速度 .ppt
- 930新政下深圳市场分析.ppt
- 9同底数幂乘法2458282889.ppt
- Determination of the solubilityproduct constant for a 恒为溶度积测定.ppt
- DHT11温湿度模块开发及应用本课设计.docx
- DS18B20毕业设计基于DS18B20温度传感器温度检测与控制系统.doc
- DME临床科研设计与评价疾病预后研究设计与分析方法.ppt
- DME临床科研设计与评价一个头对头药物随机对照临床试验分析Analysis of a RCT.pptx
- DSP控制步进电机设计报告.doc
- Determinants of the Welfare State Dependency Ratio, Wage 福利国家依赖率决定因素,工资.ppt
- DNA是主要遗传物质PPT.ppt
- DSP实验报告信号调制与解调课程设计.doc
- DSP课程设计 有限冲击响应FIR滤波器设计.doc
文档评论(0)