重庆地区人群中维生素D水平的研究-第三军医大学学报.DOC

重庆地区人群中维生素D水平的研究-第三军医大学学报.DOC

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
重庆地区人群中维生素D水平的研究-第三军医大学学报

某研究所体检人群中维生素D水平的研究 杜伟1甘承文2郭海波2程佳2单幼兰1 1. 重庆医科大学附属第二院肝病实验室 2. 重庆金域医学检验所 重庆 400012 【摘要】目的:了解重庆地区人群维生素D营养状况。方法:用串联质谱分析仪检测送检人员血25一羟维生素D[25(OH)VitD]水平,据此确定营养状况。重庆金域医学检验所2012年1月8月体检人员3875例≤14岁组(657例)、15岁-44岁组(3019例)≥45岁组(199例)应用SPSSl30软件进行统计分析。结果:本研究中,年龄≤14岁组的25(OH)VitD水平严重缺乏、缺乏、不足、正常、过量所占的比例分别为1.52%、19.03%、9.44%、70.02%和0%;而在15-44岁组中,其水平缺乏、不足、正常、过量的比例分别为?60.09%、27.59%、12.32%和0%;在≥45岁组中各项比例又为84.92%、13.07%、2.01%和0%。统计结果表明:15岁-44岁组≥45岁组中,女性25(OHVitD平均水平较男性更为低下,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01而≤14岁组无统计学意义;≥45岁组与15 -44岁组对比,25(OH)VitD水平随着年龄增加而降低,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01)且≤14岁组中有严重缺乏的现象出现结论:61.62%的成人存在缺乏,26.69%的成人不足;且随着年龄的增加更加显著,超过45岁的成年人缺乏达到84.92%。女性25(OHVitD水平各组均无过量。70.02%的儿童正常,但是1.52%?的儿童严重缺乏,19.03%的儿童缺乏,应引起足够重视。 【关键词】缺乏 ,25(OH)VitD, 营养调查The Level of Serum 25 (OH) Vitamin D among the Normal Population in Chongqing. (DU Wei, GAN Cheng-Wen,CHENG Jia,GUO Hai-BoSAN You-Lan。Department of Clinical Laboratory, The Second Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University,Chongqing 400010,China) Abstract】 Objective To investigate the distribution of Vitamin D among the normal population in Chongqing. Methods Three thousand eight hundred and seventy-five health people with age between 3 to 71, who were collected from Kingmed Diagnostics (from January to August, 2012 ) for the study of the level of serum 25 (OH) Vitamin D, which were detected by API4000Lc-MS/MS. Software SPSS13.0 was used for statistical analysis. Result In this study, three age groups (1. age ≤14 years; 2. age between 15 to 44 years old; 3. age ≥45 years) were divided for analysis the level of serum 25 (OH) Vitamin D. In group1, the ratio of Vitamin D-sufficient and insufficient people was detected as 70.02% and 9.44%, but there still have 19.03 percent young people were considered Vitamin D-deficient, more-worse, 1.52% younger were found severely- deficient in VitD. Three levels of serum 25 (OH) Vitamin D (deficient, insufficient and sufficient) were used to compare the group2 and 3 as follow: 60.09% vs.84.92%, 27.59% vs. 13.07% and 13.3

文档评论(0)

fengruiling + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档