高考英语阅读理解策略体验课(学案).docVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
高考英语阅读理解策略体验课(学案)

高考英语阅读理解策略体验课 Task 1 请分析并总结以下的命题形式。 What does the text mainly about? What is the theme of the story? What would be the best title for the text? What does the fourth paragraph mainly talk about? 以上例题为阅读理解中的 题型,其设问的关键词有 、 、 等。 2. What does the underlined phrase “that over-consumption” refer to? Which of the following words can best take the place of the word “relish” in the second paragraph? What does the underlined word “correspondence” in Paragraph 1 probably mean? 以上例题为阅读理解中的 题型,其设问的关键词有 、 、 等。 3. What can we infer about primitive birds from the text? What can we learn from the story? The last sentence implies that . What can be concluded from Paragraph 4? 以上例题为阅读理解中的 题型,其设问的关键词有 、 、 、 等。 Task 2 请独立解出下列例题并小组讨论完成体验总结。 ? Candidates(申请人) will have experience of both management and research support/technical services. Knowledge of research operations and excellent communication skills are necessary. Education to degree level is also desirable. 51. What does this paragraph mainly talk about? A. The technical skills of a would-be ROM? B. The practical experience of a would-be ROM? C. The personal information of a would-be ROM. D. The necessary requirements for a would-be ROM. ? Too much TV-watching can harm children’s ability to learn and even reduce their chances of getting a college degree, new studies suggest in the latest effort to examine the effects of television on children. One of the studies looked at nearly 400 northern California third-graders. Those with TVs in their bedrooms scored about eight points lower on math and language arts tests than children without bedroom TVs. A second study, looking at nearly 1000 grown-ups in New Zealand, found lower education levels among 26-year-olds who had watched lots of TV during childhood. But the results don’t prove that TV is the cause

文档评论(0)

cgtk187 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档