来一场靠谱网络约会吧.docVIP

来一场靠谱网络约会吧 　　Based on the numbers alone, the advantages of online dating services seem obvious. The sites grant access to larger pools of potential dates than you could ever find on your own, and the more people you connect with, the greater the chance is that one of those people could be your 1)soul mate. Some sites even promise “scientific formulas” to create perfect matches, making it sound as if the 2)odds of finding true love are all but guaranteed. Unfortunately, though, just like that certain someone who fails to call for a 3)follow-up date, there are indications these sites don’t come through on their promises. 　　A team of researchers led by Eli Finkel, a professor of social psychology at 4)Northwestern University, decided to test the claims of dating sites by comparing the likelihood that users would not only find, but also 5)stick with their “online soul mates” for the long haul. Their study, published in Psychological Science and summarized in a New York Times 6)op-ed, concludes that even though as many as 25 million people per month seek matches through online dating services, these individuals are no more likely to find their soul mates than people who 7)hook up with partners through conventional methods—singles’ bars, 8)blind dates, friends of friends. 　　What’s worse, online dating services make claims that are largely unfounded. Sites may say they use scientific methods and proven 9)algorithms as the basis for matching, but they don’t release the data due to 10)proprietary reasons, or the data they produce don’t fit the criteria for scientific acceptability. Dating sites don’t use 11)controlled studies, for example, which would be nearly impossible to do, anyway. Yet these issues haven’t stopped promoters from making 12)outlandish, unproven claims, such as the 13)bizarre one from GenePartner, a site that says its matchmaking abilities are superior because it incorporates users’DNA: “Now, 14)hard science is making it easier to find true love. A new