AW模板新概念.doc

AW模板新概念（原创首发-重新解析与归纳） 关于模板我在此好好跟大家分析分析。9 D( }- c+ A6 M) q先说A3 ^1 r) L1 Y+ i有关A的开头和结尾没有什么特别的，简洁明了最好，但适当的饱满些也是可取的。为了节省考场上的时间，提前写好很重要。) Y) W. s7 s9 \ i2 k( {2 w8 g我的开头和结尾如下：: L# M) Y3 J1 Y1 [) g7 Q% j K, cThe author of this argument attempts to convince us that (结论), based on his hypothesis and reasoning. Meanwhile, the author also cites a series of evidences in order to bolster the recommendation/claim. The assumption underlying in this argument is not without merits, nonetheless I find that the argument is unconvincing for several logic flaws. The main flaws of the argument would be discussed respectively.0 I) u E- ?/ J; u# @! h; Q {) z0 R5 BTo sum up, in this well-presented but not thoroughly well-reasoned argument, the conclusion lacks authenticity since the evidence quoted in the analysis lends feeble support to what the author espouses. To make it logically acceptable, we would need more concrete information with reference to the assumption and take into account all the dimensions discussed in the above analysis. Accordingly, only with more logical reasoning could this argument turn to be more than just an emotional appeal.: }$ ~3 N/ f0 p! R8 h) v4 M/ W开头结尾解决了就是中间的分析部分了。0 p! E1 \* }: I% s# j( P7 L3 X2 g3 L我分析的思路是这样的，并不是一段一个错误，而是一段一类错误。我中间写四段，采用的攻击方式是：8 R- `: C, y7 G _! ?( K4 P$ i/ Z第一次攻击：论据的有效性* v8 P9 } F% K9 g模板如下： y$ ???c. m B# f??F, M T1 k2 C: JTo begin with, the evidence should be showed to be reliable before I can accept any conclusion the author arrives at based on it. The author cites the evidence collected during the investigation; however I thoroughly doubt the validity of arguments. In the first place, (无效调查1). In the second place, (无效调查2). In the third place, (无效调查3). Hence, without considering these conditions the author cannot draw any firm conclusion based on the study’s result.9 ^, I+ ]5 F- t% W! m7 |* U- l% Z0 c) V/ i e0 C s5 d3 Z看得出，这段攻击的都是调查方面的有效性问题，看过所有的A你会发现，绝大多数都是调查一个事件然后??出某个结论，所以我们可以采用这种方式来攻击。, h) m- l! P: ^6 B6 \4 E, o( {4 x那