MORAL FOUNDATIONS AND IDEOLOGY - Faculty Web Sites 道德基础与思想-学院网站.docVIP

下载本文档

4
0
约5.9万字
约 22页
2018-06-27 发布于福建
举报
版权申诉

MORAL FOUNDATIONS AND IDEOLOGY - Faculty Web Sites 道德基础与思想-学院网站.doc

1、原创力文档（book118）网站文档一经付费（服务费），不意味着购买了该文档的版权，仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用，不得用于商业用途，未经授权，严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等，侵权必究。。
2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传，本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺！文档内容仅供研究参考，付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费，意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险，本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务；查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档，您可以点击这里二次下载。
3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等，请点击“版权申诉”（推荐），也可以打举报电话：400-050-0827(电话支持时间：9:00-18:30)。
4、该文档为VIP文档，如果想要下载，成为VIP会员后，下载免费。
5、成为VIP后，下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后，不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
6、成为VIP后，您将拥有八大权益，权益包括：VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传，每下载1次，网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等，对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档

MORAL FOUNDATIONS AND IDEOLOGY - Faculty Web Sites 道德基础与思想-学院网站

The Ties that Bind: How Five Moral Concerns Organize and Explain Political Attitudes Spassena Koleva, University of California, Irvine Jesse Graham. University of Virginia Jonathan Haidt, University of Virginia Ravi Iyer, University of Southern California Peter H. Ditto, University of California, Irvine May 22, 2009 [Manuscript under review. Comments welcome] Abstract Many commentators have noted that the issue positions taken by partisans in the “culture war” seem at times to be contradictory, or at least conceptually unrelated in an obvious way. In this paper we apply moral foundations theory (Haidt Graham, 2007) to the prediction and understanding of opinions on culture war issues. In two studies and across 20 such issues (e.g. abortion, defense spending, gun control) we found that endorsement of the five moral foundations predicted judgments about these issues over and above self-reported political ideology, age, sex, and religious attendance. Our results indicate that moral intuitions – particularly those about spiritual purity – may underlie, motivate, and unite partisan positions across a broad range of issues. The Ties that Bind: How Moral Concerns (Particularly Purity) Organize and Explain Political Attitudes Imagine two Americans, Libby and Connie. Libby believes abortion should be legal and supports tight restrictions on gun purchases, while Connie believes that the sanctity of fetal life mandates the criminal prosecution of abortion doctors and believes that any restrictions on gun purchases violate the Second Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. Which one of these two people is more likely to favor capital punishment? Most Americans know intuitively that the answer is Connie, because of her conservative stance on abortion and gun control. But what makes these three positions hang together as conservative positions? Why is Connie for the death penalty if she’s pro-life? And why does Libby believe in individual freedom in the case of abortion but not i