公司法和商法双语案例CorporateandBusinessLawCases.DOC

公司法和商法双语案例CorporateandBusinessLawCases.DOC

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
公司法和商法双语案例CorporateandBusinessLawCases

教学案例101-F4.CORPORATE BUSINESS LAW Case SummariesOffer and Acceptance Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain v Boots Cash ChemistsHeld that the display of drugs on open shelves was merely an inducement to the buyer to make an offer to buy, not an offer to sell capable of acceptance.Hyde v WrenchAn offer to sell at £1,000 was met with a counter offer at £950. This was rejected. The subsequent acceptance at the original price was legally ineffective as that offer had been terminated by the counter offer.Neale v MerrettAn offer to sell land at £280 was accepted at the full price, enclosing £80 and an undertaking to pay the balance by instalment. This conditional acceptance of the offer had terminated it so no legal contract existed.Stevenson v MacleanM offered to sell iron ‘at £2.00 net cash per ton till Monday’.Monday: S telegraphed to ask if M would accept £2.00 for delivery over 2 months or, if not, longest limit M would give.10.01: M receives telegram.1.34pm: S accepts by telegram.M had sold to someone else. Advised S by telegram sent at 1.25pm which arrived at 1.46pm.Court held S’s first telegram was a request for information not a counter offer which did not terminate the original offer. A valid contract existed.Byrne v Van Tienhoven1 October offer letter posted in Cardiff8 October revocation letter posted in Cardiff11 October offer letter received in New York. Telegram of acceptance sent. 15 October letter confirming acceptance posted in New York20 October revocation letter received in New YorkHeld: the letter of revocation could not take effect until actually communicated on 20 October. There was a binding contract.Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co.The Carbolic Smoke Ball Co advertised their product during an influenza epidemic as being able to stave off the flu. If anybody used their smoke ball in accordance with the printed instructions and caught the flu they would pay the individual £100. To show their good faith they deposited a sum of money with their b

文档评论(0)

fengruiling + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档