评价理论视域下国家身份建构的态度资源分析 —以亚投行及世界银行官方发言为例.pdf

Advances in Social Sciences 社会科学前沿, 2017, 6(6), 784-792 Published Online June 2017 in Hans. /journal/ass /10.12677/ass.2017.66111 Attitudinal Analysis of National Identity Construction on Appraisal Theory —Taking the Public Speeches of Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank and World Bank as Examples Haijuan Song, Honghong Zhou School of Language and Communication Studies, Beijing Jiaotong University, Beijing th rd th Received: Jun. 5 , 2017; accepted: Jun. 23 , 2017; published: Jun. 26 , 2017 Abstract The present research takes the public speeches of the Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank from the official websites of the Ministry of Finance and that of World Bank and analyses their different attitudinal resources in frequency and ratio from the perspective of the Appraisal Theory to reveal the different national identities they construct. The results indicate that the former constructs the identity as a positive “judge” and “leader”, while the latter as a neutral “judge”, “participant” and “supporter”. Keywords Appraisal Theory, Attitudinal Resources, Public Speeches, National Identity Construction 评价理论视域下国家身份建构的态度资源分析 —以亚投行和世界银行官方发言为例 宋海娟，周红红 北京交通大学语言与传播学院，北京 收稿日期：2017年6月5 日；录用日期：2017年6月23 日；发布日期：2017年6月26 日 摘 要 本研究选取我国财政部网站筹建亚投行的发言与世界银行官网世行行长发言各五篇作为分析文本，运用 文章引用: 宋海娟, 周红红. 评价理论视域下国家身份建构的态度资源分析[J]. 社会科学前沿, 2017, 6(6): 784-792. /10.12677/ass.2017.66111 宋海娟，周红红 评价理论框架对其态度资源进行手工分析，关注亚投行和世行官方发言中态度资源使用的频率和各部分 比例，以揭示这些差异所构建的国家身份的区别。结果显示，亚投行通过话语建构的是积极的“裁判者”、 “领导者”的身份，而世界银行建构的是均衡中立的“裁判者”、“参与者”和“支持者”的身份。 关键词 评价理论，态度资源，官方发言，国家身份建构 Copyright © 2017 by authors and Hans Publishers Inc. This work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribut