两淮矿区-水文地质条件分析对比研究.docVIP

宿州学院毕业论文 PAGE PAGE I 宿州学院毕业论文 本科毕业论文 两淮矿区水文地质条件分析对比研究 LIANGHUAI MINE ANALYSIS AND COMPARISION OF HYDROGEOLOGICAL CONDITIONS 学院（部）： 地球科学与工程学院 专业班级： 地 质 工 程 学生姓名： 陈 晨 指导教师： 刘 向 红 老师 2011年 1月 5日 两淮矿区水文地质条件分析对比研究 摘要 两淮矿区是我国13个大型煤炭基地之一，是我国重要的煤炭和精煤生产基地。矿区突水事故频繁发生，造成经济和人力资源损失，体现了研究矿区水文地质的重要性。本文通过对亳州和淮南潘谢矿的水文地质条件分析，总结对比两地矿区水文地质条件的异同之处。亳州地区浅层孔隙水组由第四系全新统大墩组（Q4d）及上更新统茆塘组（Q3m）组成，含水层岩性为粉土、粉砂、粉细砂。淮南潘谢矿浅层孔隙水组由第四系上更新统、全新统地层组成，岩性以粉细砂为主。两区浅层孔隙水补给来源主要都是降水入渗，排泄方式主要为蒸发、侧向径流、人工开采和向深层越流及向河流排泄。 关键词：两淮 矿区 水文地质 浅层孔隙水 LIANGHUAI MINE ANALYSIS AND COMPARISION OFHYDROGEOLOGICAL CONDITIONS ABSTRACT Lianghuai mine is one of 13 large coal bases in China，and it’s an important production base of coal and clean coal. Mine water inrush occurred frequently, resulting in loss of economic and human resources, reflects the importance of mine hydrogeology. Based on analysis the hydrogeological conditions of Bozhou and the Panxie mining, comparison the hydrogeological conditions and found the similarities and differences between them. The shallow pore water of Bozhou group consists of Quaternary Holocene Dadun group (Q4d) and Upper Pleistocene Mao Tong Group (Q3m), and aquifer lithology is silt, silt, fine sand. The shallow pore water of panxie in Huannan is formed by Quaternary Upper Pleistocene, Holocene strata, and the lithology is mainly fine sand. Their shallow pore water supply sources are mainly rainfall infiltration. The main excretion methods is evaporation, lateral flow, human exploitation, leaky to deep and excretion to the river. KEYWORDS：Lianghuai；mine；hydrogeology；shallow pore water 目录 TOC \o 1-3 \h \z \u HYPERLINK \l _Toc 摘要 PAGEREF _Toc \h I HYPERLINK \l _Toc 1 绪论 PAGEREF _Toc \h - 1 - HYPERLINK \l _Toc 1.1 研究意义 PAGEREF _Toc \h - 1 - HYPERLINK \l _Toc 1.2 研究现状 PAGEREF _Toc \h - 1 - HYPERLINK \l _Toc 1.3 研究内容 PAGEREF _Toc \h - 2 - HYPERLINK \l _Toc 2 淮北矿区水文地质条件 PAGEREF _Toc \h - 3 - HYPERLINK \l _Toc 2.1 地理位置 PAGEREF _Toc \h - 3 - HYPERL