宫内节育器嵌顿发生影响因素分析.docVIP

宫内节育器嵌顿发生影响因素分析.doc

此“医疗卫生”领域文档为创作者个人分享资料,不作为权威性指导和指引,仅供参考
  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
宫内节育器嵌顿发生影响因素分析

宫内节育器嵌顿发生影响因素分析   【摘要】目的:探索宫内节育器嵌顿的危险因素,为减少宫内节育器嵌顿的发生提供依据。方法:选取2009年3月至2014年5月我院收治的宫内节育器嵌顿患者80例作为病例组,同期门诊80名未发生宫内节育器嵌顿者为对照组,分析宫内节育器嵌顿的相关因素。结果:单因素分析,病例组的痛经发生率(575%)高于对照组(387%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=5633,P005);病例组与对照组上环时间差异有统计学意义(χ2=10569,P001);病例组中妇科炎症发生率(525%)高于对照组(263%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=12545,P001);病例组带环怀孕发生率为(587%)高于对照组(88%),差异有统计学意义(χ2=44724,P001)。经Logistics 回归分析痛经、上环时机、妇科炎症、带环时间和带环怀孕是宫内节育器嵌顿的独立危险因素。结论:在放置宫内节育器前综合考虑妇女的综合状态,选择适宜的宫内节育器,严格遵守放置规程,加强术后观察,可减少宫内节育器嵌顿的发生。   【关键词】宫内节育器;嵌顿; 影响因素   Analysis on influencing factors ofincarceration of intrauterine deviceYE Xiaohong1, XU Zhihong2. 1.Primary Health Care Department, Jingyang District Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Deyang 618000, China; 2. Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Deyang People’s Hospital, Deyang 618000, China   【Abstract】Objectives: To provide scientific basis for preventing incarceration of intrauterine device (IUD) by probing into major causing factors of IUD incarceration. Methods: 80 patients that were diagnosed with IUD incarceration were selected as study group and 80 patients without IUD incarceration as control group, all of who were patients in our hospital from March 2009 to May 2014. Results: With single factor analysis, the rate of dysmenorrhea in the study group (57.5%) was higher than that in control group (38.7%), with statistically significant difference (χ2=5.633,P005). Difference in the time for IUD incarceration between the study group and the control group was statistically significant (χ 2=10569, P001); the rate of gynaecology inflammation in study group (52.5%) was higher than that in control group (26.3%), with statistically significant difference (χ2=12545, P001). The rate of pregnancy with IUD in study group (58.7%) was higher than that in control group (8.8%), with statistically significant difference (χ2=44.724, P001). Non-conditioned logistic regression analysis showed dysmenorrhea, the time of IUD insertion, gynaecology inflammation, duration of IUD and pregnancy rate

文档评论(0)

130****9768 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档