- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
小骨窗开颅治疗高血压脑出血患者临床分析
小骨窗开颅治疗高血压脑出血患者临床分析
[摘要] 目的 探究小骨窗开颅治疗高血压脑出血患者的临床应用效果。方法 方便择取2012年6月―2015年6月该院进行疾病诊疗的高血压脑出血患者86例设置为该次的观察对象,依照计算机随机分组方法进行分组,共分为每组患者均占据43例的常规组与实验组,其中对常规组患者采取骨瓣开颅方案进行治疗,对实验组患者采取小骨窗开颅方案进行疾病治疗,分析两组方案的治疗效果。结果 显示实验组与常规组患者的治疗总有效率分别为83.72%与81.40%,比较组间数据差异无统计学意义,P0.05;另外,实验组患者的术中出血量、手术耗时与住院时间分别为(91.33±52.20)mL、(2.11±0.82)h、(26±4)d,均明显少于或短于常规组,差异有统计学意义P0.05。结论 对高血压脑出血患者给予小骨窗开颅治疗方案的应用效果显著,值得推荐采纳。
[关键词] 高血压;脑出血;治疗;小骨窗开颅
[中图分类号] R651 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2016)08(c)-0126-02
Small Bone Window Craniotomy in the Treatment of Patients with Hypertensive Cerebral Hemorrhage were Analyzed
SHI Zhen-hua
Department of Orthopedics, the Second Peoples Hospital of Changshou City, Changshou,Jiangsu Pronvince, 215500 China
[Abstract] Objective To explore the small bone window craniotomy treatment of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage in patients with clinical effect. Methods Convenient selection Will pick in June 2012―June 2015 to our hospital for disease diagnosis and treatment of 86 cases of hypertensive cerebral hemorrhage patients is set as the observation object, grouped according to computer random grouping method, which is divided into each group patients were 43 cases of normal group and experimental group, including the conventional group patients for treatment, the plan of bone flap craniotomy in the experimental group patients take small bone window craniotomy scheme for disease treatment, analysis the therapeutic effect of two groups of solutions.Results Show that the experimental group and the treatment of patients with normal group total effective rate was 83.72% and 83.72% respectively, comparing data no significant difference between groups,P 0.05; In addition, the experimental group of patients with intraoperative blood loss, surgical time and length of hospital stay (91.33 ± 52.20) mL, (2.11±0.82)h and (26± 4)d, were significantly less than short or the conventional group,the difference was statisti cally significant. P 0.05. Conclusion In patients with
文档评论(0)