四库全书总目唐诗批评研究-a study on the criticism of tang poetry in siku quanshu.docxVIP

《四库 《四库全书总目》唐诗批评研究 I I 中文摘要 《四库全书总目》是清代、同时也是中国历史上最杰出的目录学著作。《总目》以部、 类序和书目提要的形式，对乾隆以前中国历史上最重要的上万种图书进行系统、缜密的品 评，具有极高的学术价值，这其中也包括对有关唐人别集、总集的品评和对唐诗的批评。 《总目》的诗歌批评历来受到研究者的重视，其唐诗批评在清代别具特色，亦足为一家之 言。 首先，本文介绍清代以前的唐诗研究概况，然后以《总目》的唐诗批评为重点，结合 唐诗研究史尤其是清代的唐诗批评思潮，从传统儒家诗学观的异同、唐宋之争的调和及唐 诗分期的界定三个方面进行论述，将《总目》与其他诗论家，主要是清代诗论的观点进行 比较，认为《总目》的唐诗批评思想与观念总体上与清代唐诗批评主流思潮相一致，其主 要特色是试图在传统儒家诗学的观念下弥合各家之论，以期对唐诗作出公平、客观、正确 的评价。 其次，梳理《总目》的唐诗批评的具体观点和特色，本文总结为：文以载道的政治观； 以“雅”论诗、以“格”论诗的艺术观；唐诗史观；辩证有据、反对穿凿附会的唐诗作家 论和兼具目录学及诗文评著作特点的融考证与评论于一身的唐诗批评特色。其唐诗批评可 谓清人唐诗研究中之“体大思深”者，又是唐诗研究史上之“绝无仅有”者，甚或乃是唐 诗研究在传统与现代之间的“继往开来”者。由于其庞大的结构体系、丰富的研究材料及 精细的论辩方式似乎已经具备了现代学术研究的某种因素，于今不无可鉴之处。 关键词：四库全书总目；唐诗批评；清代唐诗批评； II II Abstract Si Ku Quan Shu Zong Mu (The Annotated Catalogue of the Emperor’s Four Treasures) compiled in Qing Dynasty is the most illustrious bibliographic work in Chinese history. The Annotated Catalogue consists of categories, classified preludes and synoptic bibliography appraising and elaborating on more than ten thousand most important works before Qing Dynasty systematically, including literary criticism of collected works and anthologies of writers in Tang Dynasty, and criticism of Tang Poetry. It has highly significant academic values. Whereas in The Annotated Catalogue poetic criticism has always been drawing much critical attention, criticism of Tang Poetry in Qing Dynasty has its own characteristics and thus has established its school of thought. First, this thesis is to review the study of Tang Poetry before Qing Dynasty in general. Then I will focus on specifically the criticism of Tang Poetry in The Annotated Catalogue by introducing in the context of literary history of Tang Poetry and the criticism of Tang Poetry in Qing Dynasty in particular. I will mainly approach the criticism of Tang Poetry in The Annotated Catalogue by comparing it with criticisms by other critics’ in Qing Dynasty and in other dynasties in the same tradition of Confucian poetics. Meanwhile, I will talk about the debate of the status of