骨折创面感染护理方式初步研究.docVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
骨折创面感染护理方式初步研究

骨折创面感染护理方式初步研究   [摘要] 目的 探索骨折创面感染的护理方式。方法 随机选取该院在2011年11月―2014年11月期间收治的70例骨折创面感染患者,进行动态随机化分为两组(观察组和对照组),每组有35例患者,对照组采用常规护理,观察组采用优质护理。对比分析两组患者的治疗效果、护理满意度、创面皮肤重生率等指标的变化情况。 结果 观察组患者的骨折愈合时间(1.95±0.59)个月、住院时间(17.02±2.98)d均明显短于对照组(P0.05);观察组患者的护理满意率(97.14%)明显高于对照组(60.00%),且护理后观察组患者的生活质量评分明显优于对照组(P0.05),观察组患者的创面肉芽组织生长时间(14.36±1.85)d、创面清洁时间(7.25±1.87)d均显著优于对照组,观察组患者的创面皮肤重生率(100.00%)明显优于对照组(65.71%),两组比较差异有统计学意义(P0.05)。结论 优质护理在骨折创面感染患者中效果显著。   [关键词] 骨折;创面感染;护理方式;研究   [中图分类号] R47 [文献标识码] A [文章编号] 1674-0742(2017)01(c)-0154-04   Initial Research on the Nursing Method of Fracture Wound Surface Infection   XU Yu-feng   Department of Orthopedics and Traumatology, Shaoguan Hospital of Traditional Chinese Medicine, Shaoguan, Guangdong Province, 512026 China   [Abstract] Objective To explore the nursing method of fracture wound surface infection. Methods Random selection 70 cases of patients with fracture wound surface infection admitted and treated in our hospital from November 2011 to November 2014 were selected and randomly divided into two groups with 35 cases in each, the control group adopted the routine nursing, while the observation group adopted the excellent nursing, and the treatment effect, nursing satisfactory degree and regeneration rate of wound skin changes of the two groups were compared and analyzed. Results The fracture healing time and length of stay in the observation group were respectively(1.95±0.59)months and (17.02±2.98)d, which were obviously shorter than those in the control group(P0.05), and the nursing satisfactory rate in the observation group was obviously higher than that in the control group, (97.14% vs 60.00%), and the quality of life score in the observation group after nursing was obviously better than that in the control group(P0.05), and the wound surface granulons tissue growth time and wound surface cleaning time in the observation group were respectively (14.36±1.85)d and (7.25±1.87)d, which were obviously better than those in the contr

文档评论(0)

erterye + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档