城管行政处罚权研究-宪法学与行政法学专业论文.docxVIP

一、行政执法过程中更多依靠处罚来实现，影响我国行政法制建设进程 ··········· 17 二、行政执行过程中面临太多利益的诱惑，容易激化行政权与公民权的矛盾 ······· 18 三、行政执法过程中缺乏民主因素·········································19 第三章 行政法视野下对城管行政处罚权制度改革之反思 ··························20 第一节 城管行政处罚权改革的实质：行政处罚权 “第二次”分配···················· 20 第二节 这场改革背后存在的诸多隐忧···········································21 一、改革的成本和收益不成正比···········································21 二、 改革并非以“人本主义”为理念，并没有消除传统行政处罚体制的弊端········· 21 三、改革违背了职权法定主义的基本原则···································22 第三节 城管行政处罚权改革违背了诸多行政法学基本原则·························23 一、改革违背了法律优先原则··············································· 23 二、改革违背了法制统一的基本原则········································· 24 第四章 解决城管行政处罚权问题的思路········································26 第一节 放弃对立是我们进行城市公共管理的首要前提····························26 第二节 提高服务意识，改进行政执法方式·······································26 一、发挥中介组织对社会秩序的规范作用···································27 二、通过非权力性的弹性方式调动相对人的积极性···························27 三、重视相对人对行政主体的制约作用·····································28 第三节 推进行政体制改革，加强行政组织建设研究······························28 一、变革体制，允许并扩大司法机关介入······································ 28 二、适当调节结构，协调和解决行政权限冲突································· 29 第四节 创新城市管理执法体制的两种新设想·····································30 II 一、由国务院建立城市管理行政执法总局来执行城管行政处罚权···············30 二、由国务院在公安部门内增设城市管理警察总局，执掌全国城市管理执法工作··31 结束语······································································32 致谢词······································································33 主要参考文献································································34 中文摘要 城管行政处罚权制度是我国近十年来新出现的东西，是随着我国城市的结 构和功能日趋多样化和复杂化，出现了人口膨胀、环境污染、交通拥挤、居住环 境恶化等一系列问题，给城市管理工作带来了诸多难题而出现的。此项改革在一 定程度上解决了城市管理领域多头执法、重复处罚、执法挠民等“老大难”问题。 这些执法模式为强化城市管理，提升城市管理水平，积累了经验。然尔，以行政 法学的基本原理来检视之，不难发现，这场改革本身还存在诸多漏洞，就连改革 本身的合法性及正当性也都不无问题。本文基于此，通过分析“崔英杰”案入手， 对如何解决城管行政处罚权面临的问题作了一定的探索。 关键词：城管行政处罚权 “崔英杰”案 行政执法体制 司法介入 放弃对立 2 2 City administration administrative penalty right studies Summary That the city administration administrative