- 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
- 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载。
- 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
- 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
- 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们。
- 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
- 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
高层建筑气动弹性模型风洞试验的研究
高层建筑气动弹性模型风洞试验的研究
摘要:以高层建筑为研究背景,制作了气动弹性模型,通过风洞试验测得结构的时程响应结果,采用频谱分析求得结构的动力特性,采用自然激励技术法(NExT)和ARMA模型时序法以及改变模态阶数的方法获得结构的气动阻尼比,研究了结构气动阻尼比随风速的变化规律.在强风下,对顺风向的加速度响应时程结合滤波方法,消除横风向能量转移的影响,同时发现了涡激共振现象.考虑气动阻尼影响的情况下,刚体模型测压和测力得到的峰值加速度响应结果,与气动弹性模型风洞试验结果十分接近,验证气动弹性模型风洞试验结果的正确性.对于刚体模型,不考虑气动阻尼时,峰值加速度比气动弹性模型试验结果大很多,差值最大达到41%,但在某种工况下,气动阻尼的影响使结构的响应值增大,验证了考虑气动耦合作用在高层抗风研究中的必要性.
关键词:高层建筑;气动弹性模型;风洞试验;动力特性;气动阻尼;峰值加速度
中图分类号:TU973.32 文献标识码:A
Abstract: This paper studied the aeroelatic effect on tall buildings. An aeroelastic model was designed and manufactured for wind tunnel tests. With the timehistory responses of the structure obtained from the aeroelastic model in the wind tunnel test, we could identify the structural dynamic characteristics by spectral analysis, and get the aerodynamic damping from the natural excitation technique method (NExT), the ARMA method, combined with a change in mode order, and then study the rules of aerodynamic damping changing with wind speeds. In a strong wind situation, filter technique was used to analyze the alongwind timehistory acceleration response to eliminate the influence of the acrosswind energy transfer. And vortexexcited resonance existed in the process of identifying the aerodynamic damping. The peak acceleration responses of the rigid models by pressure test and highfrequencyforcebalance test, which considered the aerodynamic damping ratios, were very close to the results of the aeroelastic model test. The accuracy of the aeroelastic model test was verified. For the rigid models, irrespective of aerodynamic damping ratios, the peak acceleration responses were much larger than the results of the aeroelastic model test. The biggest difference was 41%. However, in some cases, the aerodynamic damping ratios increased the responses, and the necessity of considering the aerodynamic coupling effect on the windresistant design of flexible highrise buildings has been verified.
Key words: tall buildings; aeroelastic model; wind tunnel tes
原创力文档


文档评论(0)