公共政策执行中行政裁量权运用存在的问题及对策探析-行政管理专业论文.docx

II II Abstract Whether it is from the perspective of the policy itself or from the complex social environment, the effective implementation of public policy as authoritative public interest allocation program is inseparable from the administrative discretion. The exercise of administrative discretion is not only effective to overcome the policy itself in principle with the flexibility of the contradictory, to avoid that the policy is not reasonable, not clear, not complete and the policy implementation is inefficient and limited cognitive ability of policy executives with the rapid social development, but also can improve the implementation of the policy, and achieve public policy goals and values. However the administrative discretion also has the self-expansion characteristic as the general powers, and it’s likely for policy executives to abuse because of some factors. Because of policy executives’ low quality or legal defects such as boundaries are not clear as to the authority, the lack of discretion benchmarks and the applicable rules, the own independent selectivity, mandatory and single feature of administrative discretion, administrative operation mechanism is not sound, policy executives will not use administrative discretion reasonably. And it will immediately cause policy executive deviation, failure, damage to the policy target group and national interests, to undermine the authority of the governments image and influence policy, but also the breeding of the phenomenon of corruption and waste of resources. In order to avoid these negative impacts, it is necessary to regulate administrative discretion. The specific methods can be taken to strengthen the legal rules and regulations, and strengthening the supervision of administrative discretion, to strengthen the program control, strict accountability system and improve the overall quality of policy executives, etc. This article takes the literature of induction, systematic approach, behavioral science res