伽达默尔视域融合理论分析-外国语言学及应用语言学专业论文.docx

山东师范大学硕士学位论文 山东师范大学硕士学位论文 PAGE PAGE 10 分着重阐述了视域融合过程中的问答对话特征并突出了语言的关键所在。文章的 第四部分，指出了伽达默尔视域融合理论的意义与影响，并在伽达默尔视域融合 理论的基础上尝试性的提出自己的反思与补充。 我们发现，存在的本质是自我表现，然而存在并不终止于自我表现，倘若如 此，理解可能对于我们是一件容易的事。存在恰是无时无刻不在隐藏自己，它不 流露并且躲避它表明自身的原始性，这就给我们的理解带来更大的困难。笔者冒 天下之不韪为伽达默尔的视域融合理论做一尝试性的补充，仅仅表达对伽达默尔 先生的尊敬与其解释学思想的敬爱。 关键词：解释学 视域 伽达默尔 视域融合 分类号：B516．5 ABSTRACT Gadamer thinks that ， interpreter and the object (which are explained by interpreter) are have their own horizon .the object include history，books，personal life，philosophy，works of art are all have their own origins of the historical horizon.Therefore，when we understand the works of history，philosophy，or some kind of culture given with a history of sight are bound to have the conflict between the two different sights and historical background.But the process of understanding is not required as the classical hermeneutics， the interpreter should abandon their sight and expose to the object domain，but this requirement is practically impossible.Understand are neither to completely abandon the sight of their own and put into the object horizon ，nor put the object into the interpreters horizon simply ，but the interpreter starting from the original sight continuely and in contact with the object to be understood，so as to examine our prejudices and expand our horizon， and thus the two sight forms a whole new horizon ， this process is called fusion of horizons.Understanding of the historical text was made possible because of the readers of the text and the authors fusion of horizons. However ， the authors thought is not possible scale for measuring the significance of a work of art， even a work，if divorced from the reality of which is constantly updated experienced，and only to talk about it from itself， they contain some kind of abstraction also.In reference to logic of question and answer，Gadamer pointed out that the logic of question and answer must to reconstruct two different answer to two different questions， that is the process of a major