公路混凝土桥梁中美欧设计规范主要条文分析比较-桥梁与隧道工程专业论文.docx

公路混凝 公路混凝土桥梁中美欧设计规范主要条文分析比较 兰州交通 兰州交通大学硕士学位论文 万方数据 万方数据 万方数据 万方数据 Abstract Since the reform and opening up, Chinas economy has achieved rapid development. Civil engineering projects overseas is increasing year by year and the Chinese engineers is playing an increasingly important role in international cooperation projects. For many of those places in which these overseas projects lies are European or American colonial in history, bridge design codes of Europe or America are often used in these projects. Therefore, as a engineer involved in design, it is necessary for an understanding of the European and American bridge design specifications. In order to understand the status of the development of international concrete bridge design specifications, and find out the similarities and differences with those in national, Chinese Bridge Design Specifications (JTG D62-2004 and JTG D60-2004), American Bridge Design Specifications (AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design specification 2012) and the European Bridge Design Specifications (EN 1991 Part2- bridge traffic load , EN 1992 Part2- concrete bridges ) are based on to carry out a comparative study of some provisions of the following major elements : A brief description of the development process and the situation of ridge design codes in China , the U.S., and Europe. As for the basic requirements for bridge design, the comparison of the bridge design specifications of structural materials ( including concrete, steel) , classification and calculation methods of limit state design, the relevant regulations of loads and load combinations (including vehicle load, temperature load) between United States and Europe are mainly analyzed. The study shows that there is a big difference in classification of concrete strength criteria with the United States and Europe specification; In European specification, the design values of material strength is quotient of standard values and subentry coefficient of concrete materials, while in Chinese spe