合肥市城市景观林群落特征与效益比较分析-园林植物与观赏园艺专业论文.docxVIP

合肥市城市景观林群落特征与效益比较分析-园林植物与观赏园艺专业论文.docx

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
合肥市城市景观林群落特征与效益比较分析-园林植物与观赏园艺专业论文

 PAGE 6 Abstract Urban landscape woods, one type of Urban forest, provide an important role for city environment in both of ecological effects and landscape aesthetics, such as purify the atmosphere, block dust, alleviate heat-island effect, conserve water, fixate carbon and release oxygen, beautify the city and so on. In this paper, based on field survey for urban landscape woods in Hefei city area, author distinguished community types of landscape woods, meanwhile the species composition, community structure and stand characteristic, community characteristic value was accounted, and using I-tree tools the ecological effects and carbon storage function were estimated as well. Then construction cost and annual benefit for different  HYPERLINK /community community types of landscape woods were compared. The writer generalized community types of high value and proposed advices for the constructions of urban landscape woods. The results can provide theoretical reference for sustainable development of urban landscape woods and prompt healthy development of the city greening. The chief results were as follows: Based on survey for typical communities in different function areas, such as parks, residential areas, college  HYPERLINK /campus campus and roads, total 111 tree species were identified, which belonged to 45 families and 81 genus. The major dominant were Cinnamomum camphora, Pterocarya stenoptera, Metasequoia glyptostroboides, Bischofia polycarpa, Populus canadensis, Osmanthus fragrans, Photinia serrulata etc. Species richness index of the named landscape woods in the study area was college campus residential areas roads parks in order; Simpson diversity index and Shannon-wiener diversity index were parks college campus residential areas roads. Evenness index was parks residential areas college campus roads, so was health index. The result was relatively representative. The DBH, tree height and crown width of trees of landscape woods showed norma

文档评论(0)

131****9843 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档