坐标测量机孔径测量的不确定度评定模型研究.PDFVIP

第42卷第1期 中国测试 Vol.42 No.1 2016年 1月 CHINA MEASUREMENT TEST January，2016 doi院10.11857/j.issn.1674-5124.2016.01.006 坐标测量机孔径测量的不确定度评定模型研究 徐 磊袁 陈晓怀袁 程银宝袁 姜 瑞袁 王汉斌袁 程真英 （合肥工业大学仪器科学与光电工程学院，安徽 合肥 230009） 摘 要院以坐标测量机测量孔径为例袁阐述测量过程中影响测量结果的不确定度来源袁根据测量模型建立孔径测量的 GUM法不确定度评定模型曰利用对坐标测量机的测量系统量值特性指标分析的方法袁给出基于量值特性分析法的各 标准不确定度分量的评定模型遥通过对汽车空调压缩机后缸体的孔径测量袁比较两种方法评定的扩展不确定度遥实例 分析可以看出院对于坐标测量机复杂的非线性测量模型袁GUM法在计算灵敏系数时袁运算量较大且获得的是近似结 果袁因此其可操作性不强曰量值特性分析法通过对测量系统整体的分析袁基于大量的实验数据对测量结果进行测量不 确定度评定袁其流程和操作性更为便捷尧有效遥 关键词院计量学；不确定度评定；孔径测量；坐标测量机 文献标志码院A 文章编号院1674-5124渊2016冤01-0026-05 Uncertainty evaluation model for aperture measurement of coordinate measuring machines XU Lei，CHEN Xiaohuai，CHENG Yinbao，JIANG Rui，WANG Hanbin，CHENG Zhenying （School of Instrument Science and Opto-electronics Engineering，Hefei University of Technology， Hefei 230009，China） Abstract: The factors which may influence the measurement uncertainty of aperture measurement by coordinate measuring machine （CMM）were analyzed. Two uncertainty models were established based on guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement （GUM）and measurement system analysis （MSA）. Measurement uncertainty for aperture of workpiece were evaluated by the two methods. Moreover，seen from the evaluation example，the results of uncertainty evaluation obtained from GUM and MSA were compared，the comparison result indicates that GUM method needs large amounts of computation and can only get the approximate results in the calculation of sensitivity coefficient but MSA method analyses the whole measurement system and evaluates