基于DEA效率的高校科研评价研究-行政管理专业论文.docxVIP

基于DEA效率的高校科研评价研究-行政管理专业论文.docx

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
ABSTRACTEfficiency ABSTRACT Efficiency evaluation is a common task in economic circles or in social activities.The scientific efficiency evaluation is very important for enterprises,goven】ments or organizations to lmprove performance,and can help enterprises,govemments or organizations to provide high quality or quantity of products and services with the least consumption of costs. The dissertation employs Data Envelopment Analysis(DEA)to evaluate efficiency.DEA is a useful tool to evaluate the relative efficiencies啪ong Decision Making Units(DMUs)with multiple inputs and multiple outputs.Chames et al proposed the first DEA model,i.e.CCR model,in 1 978.Henceforth DEA has become one of the most important methods for efficiency evaluation.In these years DEA has been widely used in efficiency evaluation for enterprises,governments.financi甜 organizations,universities,airports,hospitals and SO on. The current dissertation has studied the rating and ranking problem for universities.The shortcoming of traditional DEA methods in ranking is that the weight systems are not unique.The dissertation proposed two approaches to induce common weight in ranking SO that all decision making units(universities)Can be given efficiency scores and ranked under a set of common weights which can be accepted widely.Therefore the obtained ranking results from the proposed approaches are more believable. The first approach(A Common Weights DEA model based on standard samples、 is administration—oriented under the centralized decision-making mechanism:The adminiStration sector determines some universities as standard samples,and the standard sample universities make decision on the weight system which should be accepted by all of other universities as common weight. The second approach(A MOLP(Multi—objective linear programming).DEA model)is democracy—oriented under the decentralized decision.making mechanism. All universities take part in the decision on the common weight.and the weigh

您可能关注的文档

文档评论(0)

131****9843 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档