原子炉工学.PPT

Heat Removal by Moderation Pressure tube Graphite blocks Graphite ring Gap of 1.5mm Coolant φ88mm φ114mm φ111mm φ91mm Heat generated in graphite blocks is removed by coolant Maximum graphite temperature is 720℃ at rated power RBMK VVER Russia Lithuania Finland Germany Ukraine Objective of the Experiment Power generation after the reactor scram for several tens of seconds in order to supply power to main components. There is enough amount of vapor in drum separators to generate electricity. But they closed the isolation valve. They tried to generate power by the inertia of the turbine system. Report in Dec. 1986 Trend of the Reactor Power Thermal Power (MW) Scheduled power level for experiment 30MW Power excursion sec min hour day 20-30% of rated power 200MW Time Chart Presented by USSR T. Wakabayashi, H. Mochizuki, et al., Analysis of the Chernobyl Reactor Accident (I) Nuclear and Thermal Hydraulic Characteristics and Follow-up Calculation of the Accident, J. Atomic Energy Society of Japan, 28, 12 (1986), pp.1153-1164. T. Wakabayashi, H. Mochizuki, et al., Analysis of the Chernobyl Reactor Accident (I) Nuclear and Thermal Hydraulic Characteristics and Follow-up Calculation of the Accident, Nuclear Engineering and Design, 103, (1987), pp.151-164. Requirement from the Nuclear Safety Committee in Japan Feed water Water level Drum pressure Recirculation flow rate Neutron flux Result in the Past Analysis　(1/2) Result in the Past Analysis　(2/2) Power at 200 MW Power at 48,000 MW Power just before the accident was twice as large as the report. Why??? Result of FATRAC code is transferred, and initial steady calculation was conducted. Timing of peak was different. Why??? ？？？ Possible Trigger of the Accident Positive scram due to flaw of scram rods Pump cavitation Pump coast-down Calculation Model by NETFLOW++ Code Trigger of the Accident P.S.W. Chan and A.R. Daster Nuclear Science and Engineering, 103, 289-293 (1989). ? Positive scram Andriushchenko, N.N. et al., Simulat