网站大量收购独家精品文档,联系QQ:2885784924

国际贸易Chapter10 The Political Economy of Trade Policy.ppt

国际贸易Chapter10 The Political Economy of Trade Policy.ppt

  1. 1、本文档共42页,可阅读全部内容。
  2. 2、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。
  3. 3、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  4. 4、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
查看更多
International Negotiations of Trade Policy The average US tariff rate on dutiable imports has decreased substantially from 1920–1993. Since 1944, much of the reduction in tariffs and other trade restrictions came about through international negotiations. The General Agreement of Tariffs and Trade (GATT) was begun in 1947 as a provisional international agreement and was replaced by a more formal international institution called the World Trade Organization(WTO) in 1995. International Negotiations (多边协调) of Trade Policy (cont.) International Negotiations of Trade Policy (cont.) Multilateral negotiation mobilize exporters to support free trade if they believe export markets will expand. This support would be lacking in a unilateral(单边的) push for free trade. This support counteracts the support for restricted trade by import-competing groups. International Negotiations of Trade Policy (cont.) Multilateral negotiations also help avoid a trade war between countries, where each country enacts trade restrictions. If each country has a political interest (due to political pressure) to protect domestic producers, regardless of what other countries do, then all countries could enact trade restrictions, even if it is in the interest of all countries to have free trade. Collective Action However, for those groups who may suffer large losses from free trade (for example, unemployment), each individual in that group has a strong incentive to advocate the policy he desires. In this case, the cost and time required to advocate restricted trade is small compared to the cost of unemployment. 集体行动与搭便车 美国经济学家曼瑟尔·奥尔森指出:代表团体利益的政治行为是一种利众行为,也就是说,这种行为将有利于团体中的所有成员,而不仅仅有利于实施这一行为的个人。 假设某个消费者给所在选区的国会议员写了一封信,要求降低他所喜爱的某种进口商品的关税率,而且这封信的确改变了该议员的初衷,进而使降低关税的议案得以通过。那么所有购买该进口商品的消费者,即使他们并没有劳神写信,也可以从降低了的价格中获益。 这就意味着贸易政策具有公共品(public goods)的特性。贸易政策的公共品特性又意味着贸易政策的消费者(受益者)具有搭便车(free rider)的倾向。搭便车的存在使得那些虽然在总体上损失巨大,但是任何个人的损失都很小的政策不会遭到有效的反对。这就是奥尔森所说的集体行动的困难:当施加压力以谋求某种政策的行为是有利于集团的整体利益时,那么从个人的利益出发谁都不愿意去做。 一个集

文档评论(0)

l215322 + 关注
实名认证
内容提供者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档