鼾症患者Glidescope视频喉镜与普通喉镜经鼻气管插管效果的比较-麻醉学专业论文.docxVIP

PAGE PAGE 10 Results: The intubation time with Glidescope video laryngoscope group was significantly less than with General laryngoscope group(P0．05).The incidence rate of magil forceps used and blood on laryngoscope with Glidescope video laryngoscope group was significantly less than with General laryngoscope group(P0 ． 05).BP and BIS were significantly decreased after induction of anesthesia, but there was no significant change in HR. HR BP and BIS were significantly increased after tracheal intubation(P0．05). There were no significant change in HR BP and BIS in each observation point of