如果这都不算爱.docxVIP

  1. 1、原创力文档(book118)网站文档一经付费(服务费),不意味着购买了该文档的版权,仅供个人/单位学习、研究之用,不得用于商业用途,未经授权,严禁复制、发行、汇编、翻译或者网络传播等,侵权必究。。
  2. 2、本站所有内容均由合作方或网友上传,本站不对文档的完整性、权威性及其观点立场正确性做任何保证或承诺!文档内容仅供研究参考,付费前请自行鉴别。如您付费,意味着您自己接受本站规则且自行承担风险,本站不退款、不进行额外附加服务;查看《如何避免下载的几个坑》。如果您已付费下载过本站文档,您可以点击 这里二次下载
  3. 3、如文档侵犯商业秘密、侵犯著作权、侵犯人身权等,请点击“版权申诉”(推荐),也可以打举报电话:400-050-0827(电话支持时间:9:00-18:30)。
  4. 4、该文档为VIP文档,如果想要下载,成为VIP会员后,下载免费。
  5. 5、成为VIP后,下载本文档将扣除1次下载权益。下载后,不支持退款、换文档。如有疑问请联系我们
  6. 6、成为VIP后,您将拥有八大权益,权益包括:VIP文档下载权益、阅读免打扰、文档格式转换、高级专利检索、专属身份标志、高级客服、多端互通、版权登记。
  7. 7、VIP文档为合作方或网友上传,每下载1次, 网站将根据用户上传文档的质量评分、类型等,对文档贡献者给予高额补贴、流量扶持。如果你也想贡献VIP文档。上传文档
查看更多
PAGE PAGE 12 Business Law and Ethics 2014 Contract Law Cases HYPERLINK /lawglos_Ailsa_Craig_Fishing_Co_Ltd_v_Malvern_Fishing_Co_%281983%29.html Ailsa Craig Fishing Co Ltd v Malvern Fishing Co (1983) negligence by security firm excluded by limitation clause 被告提供安保服务,当原告的船停在港口时,因为被告的疏忽,原告的船沉没了,合同称被告not be liable for any amount exceeding £1,000 in any one claim或者not be liable for more than £10,000 in any twelve month period,法庭认为这个合同里的限制责任适用。 HYPERLINK /lawglos_Balfour_v_Balfour_%281919%29.html Balfour v Balfour (1919) domestic arrangements are presumed not to be contracts 一对夫妻住在不同的地方,丈夫每月给妻子寄30块钱,后来他停止给她钱,法院判丈夫无罪,这是个domestic arrangement, because the parties did not intend that they should be attended by legal consequences. At the time the agreement was made the court did not consider that the marriage had broken down. HYPERLINK /lawglos_Barry_v_Davies_%282000%29.html Barry v Davies (2000) In an auction without reserve, there is a unilateral offer to accept the highest bid D是个拍卖师,再一次without reserve的拍卖中拒绝了出价最高的B. Court held D和owner 没有contract, 但是D和B之间有一个collateral contract(附属协定),而D的这个行为就是breach contract. HYPERLINK /lawglos_Blackpool_and_Fylde_Aero_Club_v_Blackpool_BC%281990%29.html Blackpool and Fylde Aero Club v Blackpool BC(1990) requests to tender are invitations to treat D招标管理航班,标书不能迟noon on 17 March 1983,原告post了标书at 11am on 17 March 1983,本来信会被collected在noon,结果没有。D没有考虑原告的标书,觉得他迟交了。 HYPERLINK /lawglos_Butler_Machine_Tool_Co_v_Ex-Cell-O_Corporation_%281979%29.html Butler Machine Tool Co v Ex-Cell-O Corporation (1979) battle of the forms: a counter-offer with standard terms is not an acceptance Seller的contract里写了一个条款,Buyer给Seller了一个offer,这里没有那个条款,Seller签署了并给了Buyer. Court held Seller接受了 offer, buyer got the last shot.如果双方都有一个well-drafted standard terms,很有可能最后就判no contact exists. HYPERLINK /lawglos_Byrne_v_Van_Tienhoven_%281880%29.html Byrne v Van Tienhoven (1880) offer cannot be withdrawn after it has been accepted; postal acceptance occurs on posting 1号时,

文档评论(0)

zhuliyan1314 + 关注
实名认证
文档贡献者

该用户很懒,什么也没介绍

1亿VIP精品文档

相关文档