旅游合同违约精神损害赔偿的法理探究-法学·法学理论专业毕业论文.docxVIP

害赔偿方面的明确法律规定。因此，法官在审理此类案件的过程中表 害赔偿方面的明确法律规定。因此，法官在审理此类案件的过程中表 现出较大的自由裁量权，导致同样性质的案件最终获得不同的审判结 果，增加了违约结果的不可预见性。 第五部分，作者试图建立我国旅游合同违约精神损害赔偿制度。 I一 ◆ 作者认为旅游合同是期待精神利益的合同，违反旅游合同造成的精神 损害是可以预见的，旅游合同违约精神损害赔偿符合合同法的立法宗 旨，因此我国应该建立旅游合同违约精神损害赔偿制度。建立该制度 应当选择一般禁止而例外允许型模式。要完善相关法律规定，明确旅 游合同中因违约导致的精神损害应当予以赔偿，但是要在赔偿范围、 程度及赔偿数额等方面进行必要的限制。 关键词：旅游合同，精神损害赔偿，违约责任，侵权 ～ ‘， Ⅱ ABS ABS TRACT Traditional ciVi 1 law theories general ly think on the indemnity problem that the compensation for mental distress only be aVailable in the realm of tort 1aw． The liability for breach of contract is property liability． The compensation for mental distress is not aVai 1able in case of breaching contract． So does it in tourist contract． When travel agency fails to perform its obligations under the contract or does not perform its obl igations as contracted and thus causes mental distress to traveler，because the purpose that the traveler makes the tourist contract is to gain the mental benefit which has been anticipated or ought to be anticipated by the traVel agency in the making of the contract， the traVel agency should recover a1 1 the damages caused by the breach of contract including the mental distress of course． And we should construct our own non—property loss compensat ion in breach of touri st contract system． The dissertation consists of fiVe parts apart from preface and epi 109ue． In the first part， the author defines some important concept such as tourist contract， non—pecuniary 10ss compensation， non—pecuniary loss compensation．in breach of contract． And ◆ present some Viewpoints and discuss on whether The 1iability for 1 breach of contract inc 1udes non—property l iabi l ity． Ⅲ In In the second part， the author point out that there are no grounds to negate thi s legal system． And then analyse why it is legitimacy to compensate for mental distress if someone breach of contract． In the third part， the author reviews overseas 1egal history and status on non—property damage compensat ion f